SESAMm is pleased to welcome Guy Gresham to its Advisory Board. A globally recognized capital-markets strategist and former Group Head of Global Investor Relations Advisory at BNY, Guy brings more than two decades of experience in global financial services, specializing in equity capital markets, investor relations, and sustainability. Originally from New Zealand and now based in New York, he has deep expertise in regulatory compliance, ESG governance, and aligning global standards with business operations. His presence in North America will further strengthen SESAMm’s footprint in the U.S. market at a time of rapidly evolving expectations around sustainability and reputational risk.

"Guy’s experience advising companies across more than 50 countries, combined with his understanding of the North American market, brings a tremendous amount of insight and credibility,” said Sylvain Forté, CEO of SESAMm. “He has a remarkable ability to bridge sustainability, regulation, and capital-markets strategy, and we’re delighted to welcome him to our advisory board.”

During his time leading BNY’s Global Investor Relations Advisory group, Guy oversaw a global team supporting issuers across multiple markets and guided companies through major shifts in regulation, geopolitics, and capital markets expectations. As co-chair of BNY’s enterprise ESG Advisory Council and the Sustainable Client Solutions Working Group, he advised executive management on governance and regulatory requirements, embedding sustainability into core decision-making and risk management.

Today, Guy sits on the advisory committee of Sedex, a leading global supply-chain sustainability data platform, and serves as a non-executive director at Strategy&Ops, an international consultancy focused on sustainability and digital transformation. He holds an MBA from Cornell University, a BA (Hons) in International Relations from Victoria University of Wellington, and is a 2026 Digital Statecraft Fellow at Cambridge University.

“The growing convergence of sustainability, regulation, and technology is reshaping how companies engage with investors and manage risk,” said Guy Gresham. “SESAMm is at the forefront of this transition, using advanced AI to surface insights that were previously inaccessible. I’m delighted to support the team as they scale these capabilities globally.”

We’re thrilled to welcome Guy to SESAMm’s Advisory Board and look forward to working together as we continue advancing AI-powered ESG and reputational risk analysis worldwide, including expanding our partnerships and presence across North America.

SESAMm’s AI Technology Reveals ESG Insights

Discover unparalleled insights into ESG controversies, risks, and opportunities across industries. Learn more about how SESAMm can help you analyze millions of private and public companies using AI-powered text analysis tools.

ESG frameworks and regulations have developed due to rising awareness of sustainability and supply chain risks. They aim to enhance transparency, accountability, and ethics, encouraging environmental preservation, social improvement, and better governance. While fostering innovation and financial benefits, aligning with sustainable development goals, these measures might increase costs for businesses, especially smaller ones. Differences across regions and a focus on compliance could inhibit real change, promoting a superficial 'tick-box' approach rather than significant enhancements.

This article takes an in-depth view of some of the most relevant recent regulations and analyzes how effective they seem to be.

Unraveling Supply Chain Regulations: From Past to Present

We traced the evolution of supply chain regulations from non-binding guidelines to binding laws, examining their impact on corporate sustainability. Along the way, we explored the challenges businesses face as they strive to comply with these constantly evolving standards.

Note: The list of regulations and frameworks mentioned is a high-level list of the most mentioned acts.

Global and Non-binding

When analyzing global and non-binding regulations, although they provide crucial frameworks for promoting corporate accountability by offering guidelines for responsible business conduct, they also have limitations. For instance, they lack legal enforceability due to their non-binding nature, potentially hindering compliance. Given the broad scope of the guidelines, implementation challenges arise, particularly in regions with weak governance.

Here are a few examples of recent sustainability regulations:

By Region and Binding

Binding legislation requires companies to meet specific standards in sustainability, environmental protection, and social responsibility. Non-compliance risks legal penalties and reputational damage. However, weak enforcement, insufficient penalties, and legal ambiguities often lead to criticism.
Additionally, logistical and resource constraints, especially across borders, limit the effectiveness of regulatory bodies in monitoring and enforcing compliance. Furthermore, the penalties imposed are often disproportionately low. Moreover, these bodies depend on companies’ self-reporting without independent verification, leading to underreporting.

By Country/State and Binding

State or country legislation on supply chains encounters several challenges. These include jurisdictional limitations, enforcement difficulties due to resource constraints, and compliance burdens, especially for smaller businesses. Additionally, fragmented regulations across states or countries can complicate compliance for companies operating nationally. This underscores the importance of coordinated efforts between states and the federal government to address supply chain issues effectively.
In addition, regulatory bodies contend with logistical and resource limitations, mainly when operating across borders, which can hinder their effectiveness in monitoring and enforcing compliance.

Unveiling Vulnerabilities Sector Screening for Supply Chain Controversies

In this section, we explore the evolving landscape of supply chain regulatory frameworks and ESG risks in supply chain management. We also dive into how future regulations will affect global trade, corporate responsibility, and sustainability efforts.

Supply Chain Controversies Over Time

We analyzed supply chain-related controversies from 2019 onwards and found a consistent increase each year, peaking in 2023. Concurrently, mentions of various frameworks, laws, and legislations [mentioned in Part I] related to these issues have also risen.
Our analysis reveals a strong and positive correlation between the two trends (r=0.99), indicating a significant relationship. While the apparent increase in supply chain issues, breaches, and controversies may be concerning, it's largely caused by implementing more frameworks that increase visibility and accountability. Even without binding regulations, companies' reputations are affected. Thus, the proliferation of laws and frameworks contributes to the heightened online attention to these breaches.

Supply Chain Controversies: An ESG Analysis

For this analysis, we primarily focused on environmental and social issues within the supply chain, as legislation often targets these areas due to their significant external impacts. Issues like environmental damage and labor violations are most likely to occur in the supply chain and can profoundly affect communities and ecosystems. Governance issues, on the other hand, are more internal and directly pertain to a company's operations and management practices.
Therefore, we analyzed a sample of 31,011 entities across industries with frequent mentions of ESG-related supply chain risks, focusing on social and environmental risks.

Specialized Retail has the highest incidence of social and environmental controversies, followed by Technology Software and Automobile & Components, respectively.
As shown in the graph above, many of the issues highlighted in the Social ESG supply chain pillar are driven by human and labor rights breaches, which significantly contribute to the ESG risks mentioned.

Social Risks in the Supply Chain

In specialized retail, many brands face scrutiny for alleged forced labor; some examples include Amazon, Hugo Boss, Diesel, and Costco.
Additionally, Amazon garnered widespread attention when the company settled a $1.9 million human rights abuse claim. Consumer groups sued Starbucks over deceptive ethical sourcing claims linked to human rights issues.
Walmart and Centric were also investigated for human rights violations. Moreover, reports tie Amazon and IKEA suppliers to forced labor. These controversies dominate ESG supply chain discussions in retail.

The automotive industry ranks second as notable companies like Tesla face criticism, with allegations ranging from opening showrooms in China linked to genocide allegations leading to backlash and investigations led by the US Senate. Tesla's involvement with child labor and its battery material supplier's recurrent human rights abuses further add to the scrutiny.
Furthermore, we detect multiple mentions regarding Volkswagen's supplier breach that could impact up to 3.3 million customers. Moreover, slave labor accusations resurface for Volkswagen in Brazil, while companies like Toyota Motor, General Motors, Tesla, and Volkswagen suppliers are accused of exploitative labor practices in Southeast Asian factories.

Regarding the other industries, we also see that technology hardware displays a significant proportion of mentions stemming from mentions of forced labor for Lenovo, Cisco, and Intel, and numerous controversies regarding Apple, among many other allegations.

Similarly, Companies from the food and beverage manufacturers industry were also linked with human rights violations and infringements on labor rights, with companies like Tyson Foods, McDonald's, Hershey,  Pepsi, and Nestle having multiple supplier issues connected with child labor, discrimination, and exploitative work. While Technology Software companies mentions were primarily related to contractors and content moderators’ health & safety issues and labor rights infringements from companies like Meta, Microsoft, and Google.

Environmental Risks in the Supply Chain

Environmental risks, though relatively fewer in proportion compared to social risks across sectors' supply chains are notably prevalent in specific sectors, notably in oil and gas, where incidents such as oil-well blasts are due to the lack of safety practices, improper disposal, harmful emissions from gas flaring, unremedied oil spills disproportionately impact communities and contractor negligence. This negligence has resulted in substantial environmental harm, endangering both communities and workers and, in some cases, leading to fatalities.

In specialized retail, brands’ suppliers are linked to deforestation, illegal extraction of minerals, animal cruelty, and illegal waste disposal. Similarly, controversies arise from controversial mining, breaches of clean air acts by suppliers, deforestation, and questionable cobalt sourcing in the auto and components sector. Environmental concerns also impact the food and beverage supply chain, with prevalent issues like deforestation, animal abuse, and unethical sourcing.

In sum, the evolving supply chain regulations reflect a global commitment to sustainability and ethical business practices. Navigating these regulations presents challenges and opportunities for businesses to lead in corporate responsibility and advance principles of environmental stewardship and social equity. Embracing these regulations as a compass rather than a constraint can help chart a course toward a sustainable future.

Reach out to SESAMm

TextReveal’s web data analysis of over five million public and private companies is essential for keeping tabs on ESG investment risks. To learn more about how you can analyze web data or to request a demo, reach out to one of our representatives.

Human rights concerns took center stage in November, with rising scrutiny on how digital platforms and luxury brands safeguard vulnerable users and workers. Across the market, allegations of child exploitation, extremist activity, and labor abuses exposed significant governance and oversight gaps. The month’s top three most controversial companies were Roblox Corporation, Snap Inc. (Snapchat), and Tod’s, each facing escalating legal and regulatory pressure.

#1: Roblox Corporation: Intensifying Allegations of Child Exploitation

Roblox, the video game developer, experienced a surge of human rights–related controversies, driven by lawsuits and criminal cases involving child exploitation and online extremism. Multiple families in the United States filed suits alleging that predators used the game to groom and coerce minors, in some cases leading to severe psychological harm.

Regulators also increased pressure. The Texas Attorney General sued the company, accusing it of violating safety laws and misleading parents about the risks associated with young users. Additional criminal cases surfaced in the US, Ireland, and Argentina, where adults were convicted of grooming minors through Roblox. The company faced further backlash after its CEO referred to the child predator crisis as an “opportunity,” prompting criticism even as Roblox highlighted new age-verification tools aimed at improving safety.

#2: Snap Inc.: Social Messaging Platforms Under Renewed Scrutiny

Snap Inc., known for its messaging app Snapchat, emerged as the second-most controversial company in November following several serious incidents involving minors. In the United States, a missing 13-year-old girl was found in a Pennsylvania basement after meeting a man on Snapchat, who has since been charged with human trafficking and sexual assault. Another investigation led to the arrest of a New York man after Snapchat flagged suspected child sexual abuse material on his account.

At a broader level, new research from the Canadian Centre for Child Protection revealed widespread online sexual violence among youth, with Snapchat cited as one of the primary platforms involved. The company was also named in a major lawsuit filed by US school districts against Meta, Google, Snapchat, and TikTok, alleging that platforms suppressed internal research on youth harm and failed to implement meaningful protections.

#3: Tod’s: Supply Chain Labor Abuses Trigger Legal Action

In the luxury sector, Tod’s faced heightened scrutiny following new developments in an ongoing investigation into labor exploitation at its supplier factories. Italian prosecutors expanded their probe into three company executives, citing evidence of serious labor violations involving 53 workers employed by subcontractors. Issues raised included long working hours, low wages, inadequate safety standards, and poor living conditions.

Authorities also highlighted potential negligence and omissions by management, arguing that Tod’s failed to act on inspection findings that documented the abuses. Prosecutors have requested a six-month advertising ban and previously sought judicial administration over the company’s supply chain controls.

Conclusion

November’s top controversies underscore increasing pressure on companies to ensure robust human rights protections, both online and across global supply chains. As regulators, law enforcement, and civil society intensify oversight, firms in technology and consumer markets face rising expectations to demonstrate stronger safety systems, transparent governance, and proactive risk management.

Reach out to SESAMm

TextReveal’s web data analysis of over five million public and private companies is essential for keeping tabs on ESG investment risks. To learn more about how you can analyze web data or to request a demo, reach out to one of our representatives.