Is It the Company or the Sector? Introducing the Sector CES
11/04/2026
•
5 mins read
Ford’s Controversy Exposure Score (CES) stands at 80 out of 100, in the High Risk band. That tells you how exposed Ford is to ESG controversies in absolute terms. What it doesn’t tell you is whether that exposure is unusual for a large manufacturer, or whether a recent rise is about Ford or about its whole sector.
Until now, answering those questions meant relying on experience or building your own peer group.
Today we’re launching the Sector Controversy Exposure Score (Sector CES), a daily benchmark that shows the typical level of controversy exposure in each sector. It sits right next to a company’s CES on the entity page, for every company mapped to a sector. The CES itself doesn’t change: it remains an absolute score, and the Sector CES adds the sector context alongside it.
A quick refresher: the CES is SESAMm’s ESG rating of a company’s exposure to its highest-impact ESG controversies over up to 24 months. It is expressed on an absolute 0 to 100 scale with five risk bands, from Very Low (0 to 20) to Very High (above 80), and updated every 24 hours. Each controversy’s impact combines its severity, its media coverage (rebased against the company’s own usual coverage), and how recent it is.
What the Sector CES Shows
Back to Ford. Over the past three years, its CES has swung from a peak of 98 in spring 2024, down to 48 in May 2026, and back up to 80 today. Over the same period, the Manufacturing Sector CES has held steady at around 40, between roughly 33 and 42.
Two conclusions follow at a glance. Ford has been more exposed to controversies than a typical manufacturer throughout the period. And both its long decline through 2025 and its sharp rebound since May 2026 are specific to Ford: the sector line barely moved.
Ford’s CES (solid line) against the Manufacturing Sector CES (dashed line) on the SESAMm entity page. The CES is an unsolicited rating, produced from public sources and not commissioned by the rated company.
Three Questions, Answered in Seconds
● Above or below its peers? The gap between the solid and dashed lines shows how a company’s exposure compares with what is typical for its sector.
● Company or sector? If the company line rises while the sector line stays flat, the issue is company-specific. If both rise together, you are looking at sector-wide pressure.
● Where is the sector heading? The dashed line on its own tracks how controversy exposure across a whole sector evolves over time.
How It’s Built
The Sector CES is not a new score, and it does not adjust, normalize or re-rate any company’s CES. It is built entirely from the published company-level CES, in three steps:
Classify. Companies are mapped to 21 sectors under the UN’s ISIC Rev. 4 standard. A company active in several sectors can be mapped to more than one.
Select. For each sector, we take the 100 largest companies by number of employees.
Average. Each day, the Sector CES is the simple average of those companies’ published CES. No extra weighting, adjustment, or analyst judgment is applied.
Because it uses the same data, the same scoring, and the same 0 to 100 scale as the company-level CES, a company’s CES and its Sector CES are directly comparable.
Built for Your Workflow
● Ongoing monitoring: Separate company-specific alerts from sector-wide noise, so your team focuses on what matters.
● Private markets due diligence: Benchmark a target that has no listed peer group.
● KYC and supplier onboarding: Use “above sector norm” as a clear, defensible trigger for enhanced review.
The Sector CES is live now in the SESAMm platform. Book a demo to see it on the companies you follow.
About the CES: The Controversy Exposure Score (CES) is an ESG rating issued by SESAMm on an unsolicited basis. Rated companies do not commission the rating or take part in its production. Ratings are produced exclusively from public and licensed public-domain sources.The Sector CES is a contextual benchmark calculated from published company-level CES and does not alter any company’s rating. The full methodology is available here.
U.S. banks have dramatically increased fossil fuel financing in a notable contradiction with the narrative established after COP26. According to the 2025 Banking on Climate Chaos report, compiled by the Rainforest Action Network and its partners, global banks significantly scaled up their support for the fossil fuel industry in 2024, with a staggering $162 billion increase, pushing total financing to $869 billion.
U.S. institutions are at the forefront of this backslide. JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo accounted for one-third of global fossil fuel financing, approximately $289 billion. JPMorgan alone provided $53.5 billion, a 35% rise in funding that placed it at the top of the global list. Bank of America and Citi each contributed over $44 billion, while Barclays led among European banks, increasing its lending by 55% ($35.4 billion).
Why the Sudden Surge?
This resurgence coincides with the political shift in the U.S. following the Trump administration’s departure from the Paris Agreement and weakened climate policies. In parallel, several major banks have exited the Net-Zero Banking Alliance, prompting environmental groups to accuse them of “walking away from climate commitments.”
What This Means for Climate Risk
The spike in fossil fuel financing carries profound implications. First, it increases banks’ exposure to climate liability risk. A Financial Times analysis cites growing concerns that banks may face litigation due to their financing practices in relation to climate change. Second, funneling money back into carbon-intensive sectors undermines global efforts to limit warming to 1.5 °C; long-term goals rest on systemic transitions away from fossil fuels.
Public Relations vs. Funding Reality
Banks have defended their actions by emphasizing fossil fuels and clean energy investments. JPMorgan, for instance, claims it invested $1.29 in green energy for every dollar in fossil fuel financing. Nevertheless, critics argue that green financing claims ring hollow when fossil fuel funding is simultaneously ramping up.
Rebuilding Credibility in Sustainable Finance
The disconnect between words and actions is a challenge for the financial sector. With growing scrutiny on climate claims, stakeholders demand greater transparency and accountability. Greenwashing has evolved from a reputational issue to a regulatory one, impacting trust and market access. Banks that emphasize climate commitments while increasing fossil fuel investments risk losing credibility. To maintain stakeholder confidence, a genuine transition to clean energy financing is crucial. Trust now hinges on consistent actions rather than just marketing promises, allowing us to build a sustainable future together.
SESAMm’s AI Technology Reveals ESG Insights
Discover unparalleled insights into ESG controversies, risks, and opportunities across industries. Learn more about how SESAMm can help you analyze millions of private and public companies using AI-powered text analysis tools.
A big thanks to SESAMm's investors, partners, and clients
We thank our clients, investors, and partners for your support and patronage. Thank you for being such a big part of SESAMm; you're why we do what we do, and many of you have been involved since day one. And your generous and encouraging attitude has helped get us here today.
About the award
This award is granted by a panel of leading industry experts based on our exceptional client service, innovative product development, and strong and sustainable business growth over the past 12 months.
Honored and excited
We're honored to earn Best Data Provider, Alternative Data Sources at 2023 Fund Intelligence Operations and Services Awards. We're also excited for our clients and partners because our products and services are game-changers for hedge fund services. And while we have more work to do and clients to serve, we think the future looks bright for us, our partners, and our clients.
About SESAMm and TextReveal
SESAMm is a leading NLP technology company serving global investment firms, corporations, and investors, such as private equity firms, hedge funds, and other asset management firms. Through TextReveal, we give you NLP capabilities to generate your own alternative data for use cases, such as ESG and SDG, sentiment, private equity due diligence, corporation studies, and more. And with access to SESAMm’s massive data lake, made up of 20 billion articles and messages and growing, you can make better investment decisions.
Reach out to SESAMm
For a personal demonstration of our award-winning platform, reach out to a representative
In private equity, as in most industries, decision-making counts on accessing accurate and valuable information. However, these firms often encounter significant challenges when sourcing reliable data, especially when dealing with small, private companies. This article dives into the complexities of identifying high-quality information on smaller companies and underscores its value in investment decisions, operational efficiency, and risk management. It also explores how advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are revolutionizing the identification of these risks, leading to higher rewards and more secure investments, thus providing a competitive edge.
The challenge of identifying valuable information for Smaller Firms
Lack of valuable data
Sturgeon's Law, which states that "Ninety percent of everything is crap (or noise)," becomes particularly relevant in the context of data sourcing. For private equity and investment firms focused on small companies, finding the golden nuggets of information amid the overwhelming amount of digital noise can be daunting. The data available on these companies is often sparse, fragmented, and difficult to uncover using conventional methods. This scarcity of reliable information makes it challenging for private equity firms to make informed decisions, heightening the risk of overlooking critical issues that could impact their investment process.
The difficulties extend beyond just locating information. Many small companies operate without a significant online presence or may not be required to disclose as much information as publicly traded firms. This lack of transparency can further blur critical data points. Furthermore, the data that is available is often unstructured, residing in various forms such as social media posts, obscure local news articles, or industry-specific reports. Extracting meaningful insights from these disparate sources requires sophisticated data processing capabilities, which traditional methods often lack. As a result, private equity firms are left with a significant challenge: how to separate valuable data from the noise without missing critical risk indicators, thereby optimizing their deal sourcing and investment strategies.
Diverse language and terminology
Smaller firms frequently face existential risks, and the potential rewards for identifying these risks early on can be significant for the private equity firms that invest in them. However, mainstream methods of risk identification often fall short, as these companies may not use standardized language to describe materiality. Instead, risks are discussed in varied and context-specific ways, complicating the task of recognizing relevant information. Therefore, it is essential to adopt a specialized approach that analyzes and decodes these firms' unique terminologies and business idiosyncrasies, ultimately translating them into a standardized language that can be effectively used in risk assessment.
The diversity in language is not just a barrier to risk identification but also to the communication of these risks within and between private equity firms. When a small firm uses industry-specific jargon or localized expressions to describe potential threats, it can lead to misunderstandings or underestimations of the actual risk. For instance, a manufacturing startup in a developing country might describe supply chain disruptions in terms that do not translate easily to a global investor’s risk framework. Additionally, cultural differences in how risk is perceived and reported can lead to further complications. This linguistic diversity necessitates the use of advanced natural language processing tools that can interpret data through a common lens while considering industry-specific contexts. For an insurance company, understanding financial models, insurance principles, and regulatory frameworks is crucial. Conversely, assessing risks for a beauty company requires a focus on product safety, consumer preferences, and market trends. By appreciating the specific contexts of each industry, private equity firms can better identify and evaluate potential risks, enhancing decision-making processes, risk and portfolio management strategies, and operational efficiency.
The dynamic nature of the industries themselves further complicates the challenge. For example, the tech industry evolves rapidly, with new risks emerging as technologies develop and consumer expectations shift. What might be considered a negligible risk today could become a significant issue tomorrow as regulatory landscapes, market conditions, and technological advancements alter the playing field. In contrast, industries like agriculture or real estate might have more stable risk profiles but are subject to sudden changes due to environmental factors or policy shifts. This variability across industries means that a one-size-fits-all approach to risk assessment is inadequate. Private equity firms must adopt flexible, industry-specific risk models that can adapt to the unique characteristics and evolving landscapes of the sectors they invest in, thus optimizing their AI capabilities.
The Power of AI in Enhancing Risk Management in Small Firms
AI technologies, particularly natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning algorithms, are important tools for private equity firms aiming to monitor and manage risks in small firms. These technologies can sift through vast amounts of data, extracting the valuable 10% and identifying patterns, trends, and subtle nuances in the language used to describe risks. By detecting these patterns, AI can reveal potential risks that might not be immediately apparent through traditional methods. This proactive approach to risk identification allows firms to address issues before they escalate, providing a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the risks facing small firms.
AI's ability to process unstructured data is particularly valuable in this context. Many of the risks that small firms face are discussed informally in places like social media, niche blogs, or local news outlets. Traditional risk management tools might overlook these sources, but AI-powered tools can analyze them in real-time, detecting emerging threats as they develop. Moreover, AI can cross-reference these insights with structured data from financial reports, regulatory filings, and other formal documents to create a holistic risk profile. This multidimensional analysis helps private equity firms not only identify risks but also understand their potential impact, enabling more informed, data-driven decision-making that enhances operational efficiency and competitive edge.
Beyond risk identification, AI also enhances risk mitigation strategies. By continuously monitoring data and learning from new information, AI systems can adapt to changing conditions, offering updated risk assessments that reflect the latest developments. This dynamic approach allows private equity firms to stay ahead of potential issues, making it possible to implement preventative measures rather than reacting to crises after they occur. In this way, AI capabilities contribute significantly to the optimization of risk management processes.
How SESAMm’s Advanced Technology Enhances Risk Assessment
SESAMm’s TextReveal® is at the forefront of this technological revolution, enabling private equity firms to efficiently navigate the vast digital landscape and extract the crucial information needed for informed decision-making. Through our proprietary data lake amounting to over 25 billion online articles with 15 years of historical data and our AI algorithms, TextReveal® can quickly identify and retrieve valuable insights, even when the information is deeply buried or highly specific. The tool's ability to analyze and understand the diverse language and terminology used in discussions about risks on the web empowers private equity firms to objectively assess the materiality of certain risks or identify emerging threats that have yet to be formally recognized.
TextReveal® goes beyond merely identifying risks—it categorizes them, providing context that helps private equity firms understand the severity and relevance of each risk. For example, if a small biotech firm is mentioned in discussions about regulatory hurdles, TextReveal® can determine whether these mentions are isolated incidents or part of a broader trend. It can also assess whether the language used suggests an imminent threat or a longer-term concern, enabling firms to prioritize their responses accordingly. Additionally, TextReveal® integrates sentiment analysis, which can gauge the overall tone of discussions surrounding a company, offering further actionable insights into potential reputational risks.
SESAMm has developed a proprietary metric – the Intensity Score, which calculates an event's relevance based on its news coverage and sentiment. It uses negative sentiment, article dispersion, and empirical ESG risk measures to determine how likely an article is to represent a high-risk controversy. The Intensity Score gives TextReveal users a clear understanding of which events require their attention.
Users can also opt to receive email alerts for the more severe controversies, ensuring they’re always aware of significant risks. In addition to the severity, controversies are also categorized by risk and sub–risk type, making it easy to analyze specific areas of concern.
Moreover, SESAMm's platform is designed to be intuitive and user-friendly, making it accessible to investment professionals who may not have a technical background. This ease of use ensures private equity firms can quickly incorporate AI-driven insights into their risk management processes without a steep learning curve. By streamlining the data analysis process, TextReveal® allows firms to focus on strategic decision-making, confident they have a comprehensive understanding of the risks and opportunities associated with their investments and portfolio companies. This level of operational efficiency and optimization is key to maintaining a competitive edge in the fast-paced world of private equity.
TextReveal’s Risk Assessment module enables deep company and thematic research in multiple languages through on-the-fly keyword searches. Users have full access to articles, sentiment analysis, and trending topics to get a complete understanding of the risks. We’ve even developed an AI Text Summary feature that provides a quick summary of a selected article, saving time and enabling a faster analysis.
In summary, the integration of AI tools and natural language processing technologies is transforming risk management in private equity, particularly for firms dealing with small, private companies. By leveraging these advanced tools, private equity firms can enhance their due diligence processes, better monitor risks and controversies, and ultimately make more informed investment decisions that lead to higher rewards and operational efficiency.
Reach out to SESAMm
TextReveal's web data analysis of over five million public and private companies is essential for keeping tabs on ESG investment risks. To learn more about how you can analyze web data or request a demo, contact one of our representatives.
Stay ahead with the latest in ESG and AI intelligence
Join our mailing list to receive new reports, event invites, and updates from SESAMm directly to your inbox.