SESAMm’s Infrastructure Project Coverage: 250,000 Assets and Counting
•
5 mins read
Infrastructure is no longer a niche allocation. It sits at the center of energy transition strategies, industrial policy, and long-term portfolio construction. For investors, banks, and insurers, exposure to infrastructure projects also means exposure to complex, evolving ESG and reputational risks.
More than 250,000 infrastructure projects worldwide are monitored on the SESAMm platform. This coverage continues to expand, with new projects added regularly, including in response to client requests.
“Infrastructure projects generate vast amounts of fragmented information across local media, regulatory sources, and public reporting. Our goal is to transform that information into structured intelligence. With more than 250,000 projects covered globally, SESAMm provides investors and financial institutions with the visibility needed to monitor infrastructure risks at scale,” commented Sylvain Forté, CEO & Co-Founder, SESAMm.
A Truly Global View of Infrastructure Risk
SESAMm analyzes sources in more than 100 languages and provides global visibility into infrastructure assets, including in emerging markets and jurisdictions with limited public disclosure. Through multilingual AI analysis, SESAMm monitors projects in their local information environments, detecting controversies, regulatory actions, environmental incidents, corruption cases, and governance failures as they emerge.
Whether a project is located in Europe, Southeast Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, or Latin America, clients gain access to:
Local-language media monitoring
Structured ESG event detection
Clear visibility into how events evolve over time
Severity and exposure scoring
Infrastructure risk is rarely static. It evolves during permitting, construction, operation, and financing, and SESAMm’s monitoring reflects that reality.
Coverage Across Key Infrastructure Categories
SESAMm’s infrastructure coverage includes a wide range of asset types, such as:
Solar Stations
Airports
Waste Management Facilities
Wind Stations
Dams
Coal Mines
Oil & Gas Plants
Hydropower Stations
Coal Power Stations
Steel Plants
Bioenergy Stations
Nuclear Stations
Coal Terminals
Geothermal Stations
This breadth enables clients to assess risks across both legacy and transition-aligned infrastructure.
Why Infrastructure Monitoring Matters Now
Infrastructure projects concentrate risk. They involve long timelines, large capital commitments, public scrutiny, regulatory complexity, and significant community impact.
For investors and lenders, point-in-time due diligence is no longer sufficient. A project cleared at financial close can face protests, litigation, environmental incidents, corruption allegations, or regulatory breaches years later.
Continuous monitoring is becoming essential for:
Pre-investment screening
Ongoing portfolio oversight
Secondaries transactions
Infrastructure debt underwriting
Insurance risk assessment
Sustainability and SFDR reporting
Our expanded coverage supports these workflows with structured, real-time intelligence.
On-Demand Expansion: Coverage That Grows With You
Beyond the projects already included in the dataset, SESAMm adds new infrastructure assets upon client request. This allows coverage to align directly with a pipeline of acquisition targets, a lender’s financing book, an insurer’s underwriting portfolio, or a fund’s watchlist. Rather than forcing clients to adapt to a fixed database, SESAMm’s infrastructure coverage scales dynamically to meet their needs.
With more than 250,000 assets included, SESAMm delivers one of the most comprehensive and scalable datasets for infrastructure risk monitoring. Together, this expanded infrastructure dataset and SESAMm’s AI reporting capabilities provide financial institutions with a scalable way to identify and monitor risks across infrastructure portfolios worldwide.
Paris, France – 24 février 2026 – SESAMm, leader mondial des données de controverses ESG et réputationnelles, annonce le renouvellement de son partenariat avec le Crédit Mutuel Arkéa, initié en janvier 2023, pour le renforcement de l’évaluation et du suivi des risques ESG au sein de ses activités d’achats et d’investissement.
Depuis le début de cette collaboration, Crédit Mutuel Arkéa s’appuie sur la plateforme SESAMm pour analyser les risques environnementaux, sociaux et de gouvernance liés à ses fournisseurs, partenaires et participations. Grâce à des données de controverses ESG fondées sur l’intelligence artificielle, il est possible d’identifier notamment les manquements réglementaires, incidents environnementaux, risques sociaux, atteintes aux droits humains, cas de corruption et autres risques réputationnels.
Dans le cadre de ce partenariat renouvelé, SESAMm poursuit cet accompagnement, à la fois lors des appels d’offres et dans le suivi continu des tiers, ainsi que pour l’analyse des dossiers d’investissement et la surveillance quotidienne du portefeuille, complétées par des synthèses hebdomadaires des controverses ESG.
Ce renouvellement de confiance confirme la valeur ajoutée des analyses de SESAMm pour renforcer la cohérence, la réactivité et la robustesse des processus de due diligence et de gestion des risques ESG du Crédit Mutuel Arkéa.
CEO Sylvain Forté demonstrates TextReveal’s® latest features applied to supply chain and risk analysis on the main stage of FinovateEurope 2023 in London. He also presents a quick use case on the latest Silicon Valley Bank fallout.
Discover how TextReveal can help automatically analyze millions of companies based on web content at SESAMm.
The aerospace and defense industry frequently faces ESG controversies, as these companies contend with high-exposure incidents that draw significant public and regulatory attention. In our recent webinar and ebook, we examined how AI-driven ESG evaluations enable early risk detection in these industries. Now, we want to explore what SESAMm's new Controversy Exposure Score (CES) can tell us about these same companies, including Boeing, SpaceX, Blue Origin, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and Airbus.
The aerospace and defense industry’s controversies mainly revolve around safety, labor issues, and regulatory concerns, which cause the CES scores to fluctuate considerably over time, influenced by both the volume and intensity of the events.
Boeing Analysis
Boeing has been consistently at the forefront of ESG controversies, experiencing fluctuating intensities that directly impact its CES score. These fluctuations are often tied to specific high-profile events. The company's high-intensity controversies, particularly related to deadly crashes and fraud allegations over safety concerns, have driven notable spikes in its CES score during the past few years.
Significant crash incidents and safety issues have recurred throughout the years. This has resulted in increased FAA scrutiny of Boeing in early 2021 following Boeing 787 inspections, followed by continuous inspections into the 2018 — 2019 crash scandals, which are reflected in the two CES spikes during 2021. In 2022, the CES score rose again as the company was sentenced to pay $2.5 billion for criminal charges and $200 million in settlements for SEC charges for misleading investors, both over the 737 Max scandal. In 2023, Boeing was ordered to appear in court for criminal settlements, an event classified as a high-intensity controversy, paired with significant media exposure reflected in the number of articles shared. This led to a surge in the CES spike despite the lower overall number of events during that period. In 2024, the U.S. urged Boeing to plead guilty to fraud charges related to the fatal crashes, further intensified by a whistleblower's release of additional safety concerns, resulting in further CES spikes. The most recent surge in the CES was triggered by a widespread employee strike over a contract offer, representing yet another setback for Boeing, whose reputation and finances have already been strained by manufacturing issues and federal investigations this year. Ultimately, both high-volume and high-intensity events related to Boeing’s controversies have contributed to the high CES score reflecting the company’s risks.
SpaceX Analysis
While SpaceX initially had relatively low controversy volumes and intensities in 2020, its CES score has steadily increased as well, aligning with the growth in controversies.
Notable peaks occurred in 2021, linked to controversies such as hiring discrimination concerns, an FAA investigation into test launches, and approval withholding for the Starship launch tower. Mid–2022 saw additional challenges, including CEO sexual harassment charges. Into 2023 and 2024, SpaceX’s scrutiny increased due to workplace environment-related lawsuits over hiring policy against refugees and sexual harassment and discrimination against women. Despite these events, SpaceX's controversies are less intense than Boeing's, so SpaceX has relatively lower CES scores.
Blue Origin Analysis
Blue Origin’s controversies have shown an increase over time. This surge was attributed to its conflict with NASA and SpaceX over the “Moon-landing” project. In 2022, Blue Origin faced FAA scrutiny over a flight anomaly and a workplace discrimination lawsuit. In 2023, further setbacks came from an espionage case, an engine explosion, and lawsuits involving discriminatory practices. The company experienced another wave of controversies in 2024, driven by an FAA investigation into parachute deployment failures and fresh allegations of workplace discrimination. Although Blue Origin’s controversies are relatively low in volume, occasional spikes have caused notable increases in its CES score.
Raytheon Analysis
Raytheon's CES score has remained moderate, with periodic surges between 2020 and 2021. These spikes were triggered by ESG risk events such as investor class action, violations of domestic preference laws, and the company’s involvement in Yemen's civil war. In 2022, the company faced another surge of controversies driven by an antitrust action lawsuit and further protests related to the situation in Yemen. In 2023, the CES score rose again amid backlash against the war in Gaza, the ongoing 2021 investors class action, environmental lawsuit, and FAA safety concerns for the company’s subsidiaries Pratt & Whitney, which also faced penalties for violating antiboycott regulations. Despite the diversity of ESG controversies, Raytheon’s overall CES score remains moderate compared to Boeing, thanks to the lower intensity of events it has encountered.
Lockheed Martin Analysis
Lockheed Martin's CES score has been relatively low and stable over time, with some fluctuations and few spikes. Mid–2021, the company had to pay a $10.28 million settlement for overcharging allegations; another notable surge occurred in 2022, triggered by FTC antitrust concerns over its Aerojet deal and an investor class action. The company’s involvement in war crimes in Yemen and Palestine during 2023 and 2024 has further fueled its controversies exposure hence the CES spikes. Though low in volume, Lockheed Martin’s controversies were marked by high-intensity events and media exposure, which contributed to significant spikes in its CES score.
Airbus Analysis
Airbus controversies events are relatively stable, with a slight decline overall and few spikes over time, as reflected in their CES score.
In early 2020, Airbus faced fraud and non-compliance allegations, along with a securities class action claim. By mid–2020, the company became embroiled in a bribery scandal. Toward the end of 2020 and into 2021, the long-standing Boeing-Airbus subsidy dispute resurfaced. In 2022, the bribery case remained unresolved, leading to Airbus agreeing to a $4 billion fine while also facing a $339 million class action lawsuit. The bribery allegations were still unfolding in 2023, accompanied by corruption claims in 2024. Compared to Boeing, Airbus has experienced fewer controversies in terms of volume and less severe high–intensity events. As a result, its CES score has remained relatively stable over time, with only minor fluctuations, primarily driven by legal investigations.
Conclusion
In the aerospace and defense industry, ESG controversies continue to shape the reputational and operational risks of leading companies. Boeing, SpaceX, Blue Origin, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and Airbus each face unique challenges that are reflected in their CES scores. While Boeing and Airbus have seen higher volumes and intensities of events, others like SpaceX and Blue Origin have witnessed moderate to low exposure but still face periodic scrutiny due to high–impact incidents. As these companies navigate evolving regulatory landscapes, labor concerns, and public perception, their CES scores will remain a critical indicator of their ESG performance. Download the ebook “The Boeing Scandal: Can AI Predict Controversies Before Traditional Tools?” to learn more about the Boeing scandal.
Reach out to SESAMm
TextReveal’s web data analysis of over five million public and private companies is essential for keeping tabs on ESG investment risks. To learn more about how you can analyze web data or to request a demo, reach out to one of our representatives.
Stay ahead with the latest in ESG and AI intelligence
Join our mailing list to receive new reports, event invites, and updates from SESAMm directly to your inbox.