Sayari and SESAMm Partner to Revolutionize ESG Risk Management in Supply Chains

As 2026 kicks off, I want to take a moment to reflect on the year we’ve just closed. 2025 was an important year for SESAMm, marked by both significant milestones and quieter, foundational progress. We launched new AI-powered reports, welcomed major clients, expanded our coverage, and saw our technology move deeper into real decision-making workflows.

None of this would have been possible without the trust and engagement of our clients, partners, advisors, and team. Your willingness to challenge us, work with us, and build alongside us continues to shape what SESAMm becomes.

Below, I’ve shared a few moments from 2025 that helped move us forward, along with what we’re looking ahead to in 2026.

Growing Through Strong Partnerships

In practice, SESAMm’s data is used in very different ways. It supports large-scale monitoring across thousands of suppliers and assets, while also enabling in-depth analysis of individual companies and local markets.

In 2025, collaborations with organizations such as Sayari, BNP Paribas, Caisse d’Epargne Rhône Alpes, ENGIE, Clarity AI, and Inrate reinforced something we have believed from the beginning: understanding risk today requires data that is both scalable and usable within real decision-making workflows.

More importantly, these partnerships reflect the confidence placed in the quality of SESAMm’s data and its breadth of use. In one case, a financial institution used supplier monitoring to identify early signals of forced labor risk in a supply chain that had previously passed traditional audits. That insight did not replace existing processes, but it changed the questions being asked and the actions that followed.

Welcoming New Advisors

We were also proud to welcome Guy Gresham and Magnus Billing as advisors this year. Their experience, perspective, and intellectual rigor have already challenged us in the best possible way.

As we continue to build SESAMm for the long term, their guidance helps ensure that our technology remains both ambitious and grounded in how risk is actually understood, assessed, and managed in the real world. In a market that is evolving quickly and sometimes unpredictably, that discipline matters.

From AI Promises to AI in Practice

AI dominated conversations again this year. What changed in 2025 was less the technology itself, and more how our clients engage with it.

Initially, the question was whether AI could reliably identify risks. Today, that question has been answered and the conversation has shifted. Clients are asking which risks are most important, which require action, and how to prioritize limited time and resources.

At SESAMm, this translated into concrete product evolution, all with the same objective: supporting both large-scale monitoring and deeper, decision-level analysis. We launched and expanded AI-powered reports, introduced UN Global Compact violation screenings, and significantly increased the number of companies and infrastructure projects we cover globally.

AI is no longer treated as an experimental layer. Our clients are using it as a core component for identifying and tracking risks over time. The question they now face is not whether AI can surface risk, but how to decide which signals deserve attention.

ESG Is Changing, Whether We Like the Term or Not

AI The ESG landscape itself is going through a transformation. Regulatory pressure is uneven. In some regions, expectations are tightening while in others, frameworks are being diluted or politicized. At the same time, the term “ESG” is itself losing ground; it means too much and therefore explains too little.

That has not changed, however, is the nature of the underlying risks. Human rights, forced labor, biodiversity loss, governance failures, and reputational exposure are becoming increasingly visible and material to investors, companies, and regulators alike. The conversation is shifting from broad labels to specific facts, with greater attention paid to the events and the evidence that inform both scores and decisions. This shift from labels to evidence is where SESAMm’s approach is particularly relevant.

Looking Forward

As we move further into 2026, our focus remains clear. We will continue to invest in signal quality over noise, depth over surface-level insight, and tools that help our clients act, not just observe. We will keep expanding coverage where risk is hardest to see, particularly in private markets, and will continue to develop cutting-edge AI agents to support client workflows.

The question for 2026 is not simply how much risk data organizations have, but how effectively they interpret and prioritize it in practice.

Above all, we remain committed to building technology that supports our customers and partners with clear, reliable insight into risk, grounded in reality as it is.

Thank you again to our clients, partners, advisors, and team for your trust and engagement over the past year. We look forward to continuing this journey together!

Wishing you a wonderful and successful year ahead,

Sylvain Forté
CEO, SESAMm

Reach out to SESAMm

TextReveal’s web data analysis of over five million public and private companies is essential for keeping tabs on ESG investment risks. To learn more about how you can analyze web data or to request a demo, reach out to one of our representatives.

Today, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria have become critical in shaping companies' operational and strategic directions. As organizations strive to align with the United Nation’s sustainable development goals (SDG), understanding the variances in ESG performances across different geographical regions becomes crucial. This article explores ESG discrepancies in North America, Latin America, Europe, Australia, Asia Pacific, and Emerging Countries. By dissecting the prevalent ESG risks and illustrating the distribution of SDG adverse behaviors within these regions, we aim to provide a granular analysis that not only highlights regional challenges but also paves the way for tailored strategic frameworks. This nuanced approach facilitates an informed assessment of disparities, empowering stakeholders to craft effective and regionally nuanced strategies.

ESG Overview: A Regional Perspective

Upon standardizing data across the examined regions, our analysis unveiled a predominance of social risks across the board. Yet, the regional specificities unveil the complexity of global ESG landscapes.

Upon standardizing data across the examined regions, our analysis unveiled a predominance of social risks across the board. Yet, the regional specificities unveil the complexity of global ESG landscapes.

Latin America is markedly affected by environmental risks, underscored by legal actions against companies for endangering biodiversity. Legal battles over toxic spills, water contamination, and ecosystem-threatening activities vividly portray this region's environmental challenges.

Europe emerges as a hotbed for governance-related risks, particularly emphasizing influence strategy and communication. European companies find themselves at the correlation of controversies ranging from greenwashing and emissions cheating to governance failures, spotlighting the complex governance terrain they navigate.

While grappling with governance risks, North America and Australia exhibit unique profiles. North American firms face various governance challenges, from securities fraud to greenwashing, painting a complex picture of corporate governance in the region. Australian companies are likewise embroiled in governance concerns, predominantly linked to senior management and regulatory compliance, reflecting the governance trials specific to the Australian context.

Emerging countries highlight the prevalence of social controversies, from human rights violations to labor rights concerns, underlining these regions' social complexities.

This multifaceted overview underscores the broad spectrum of ESG risks while illuminating the distinctive challenges faced by each region.

UNSDG Adverse Behaviors: Regional Breakdown

When looking at UNSDG adverse behaviors for the same regions, we find regional trends and more generalized ones. For example, Goal 1, “End Poverty,” displays one of the highest breach rates of all the goals. Whereas Goal 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation, displays interesting discrepancies, mainly exposing differences between developed and developing countries.

The table below provides a detailed comparison of SDG adverse behaviors across regions, categorizing them by specific goals to highlight regional differences in SDG challenges.

Goal 1, "End Poverty," is the most prevalent SDG issue across all areas. Europe is experiencing the most significant impact due to various factors, including labor rights issues, human capital concerns, governance challenges, anti-competitive practices, and tax controversies.

Similarly, Goal 16, "Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions," underscores significant issues in North America related to human rights, labor, management integrity, anti-competitive actions, tax strategies, corruption, and shareholder matters, driven largely by flaws in the criminal justice system, including over-incarceration, racial bias, and police misconduct. These problems undermine public trust and equality, highlighting the need for governance improvements despite North America's strong institutional base.

Emerging countries face the greatest challenges with Goals 3 and 11, "Health & Well-being" and "Sustainable Cities," respectively, due to inadequate healthcare infrastructure, disease prevalence, limited healthcare access, poor sanitation, pollution, overcrowding, and substandard urban planning. Addressing these issues requires substantial healthcare, sanitation, and sustainable urban development investments to mitigate risks.

UNGC Controversies: A Regional Analysis

Our exploration extends to aligning ESG controversies with their respective regions and assessing the proportion of these risks aligning with breaches of the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) principles.

Latin America emerges as the frontrunner in this evaluation, demonstrating a noteworthy prevalence of breaches, particularly within the environmental pillar. Notably, the focal point centers on environmental damages attributed mostly to mining and metals companies.

Australia is marked by a significant number of controversies surrounding human rights violations. These encompass various instances, ranging from privacy breaches and infringements on the right to security and dignity and diversity & inclusion. These incidents have garnered considerable attention, contributing to the heightened significance of regional human rights breaches.

In North America, despite a considerable share of human rights breaches, it distinguishes itself by exhibiting the highest prevalence of labor rights violations. In contrast to other regions, North America faces a substantial number of lawsuits related to employment, particularly concerning diversity and inclusion breaches, including harassment lawsuits and instances of racial bias.

European companies distinguish themselves through notable instances of Anti-corruption pillar breaches, including multiple failures in money laundering investigations, legal actions resulting in lawsuits and fines, as well as settlements for bribery allegations and accusations of kickbacks.

Latin America's environmental controversies, Australia's human rights challenges, North America's labor rights issues, and Europe's anti-corruption breaches each tell a part of the global ESG narrative, demonstrating the diverse facets of regional ESG controversies.

Leveraging SESAMm for Insightful ESG Analysis

SESAMm's technology identifies and analyzes potential risks and controversies through our advanced AI-powered text analysis tool, providing essential insights for stakeholders. This capability is invaluable for organizations, particularly private equity firms and financial institutions, aiming to navigate ESG complexities. By leveraging SESAMm's insights, businesses can adapt their ESG strategies to their regional contexts' unique challenges and opportunities, ensuring global sustainable and responsible operations.

Conclusion

To summarize, this analysis underscores significant regional differences in ESG factors, with social risks emerging as a common concern worldwide. Yet, regional distinctions are evident: Latin America is particularly impacted by environmental issues, Europe grapples with governance risks, and emerging nations face a surge in social controversies. The detailed analysis of SDG adverse behaviors, organized by goals for each region, highlights these differences further. It is imperative for companies to recognize and adapt to these regional nuances in their ESG strategies, ensuring approaches are finely tuned to address the distinct risks and challenges prevalent in their specific operational environments.

SESAMm’s AI Technology Reveals ESG Insights

Discover unparalleled insights into ESG controversies, risks, and opportunities across industries. Learn more about how SESAMm can help you analyze millions of private and public companies using AI-powered text analysis tools.

With 2023 drawing to an end, we wanted to share the most relevant ESG controversies during the year. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview of the year's top ESG controversies, breaking them down into the three pillars of ESG: Environmental, Social, and Governance. Through our research, we will explore each of these areas in detail, shedding light on the most talked-about controversies and the companies involved.

Methodology

To gain a comprehensive understanding of the ESG risks in 2023, we conducted a thorough analysis of web mentions related to SESAMm’s ESG taxonomy across our expansive data lake with 20B+ articles. This allowed us to evaluate the overall volume of mentions related to each risk category: Environmental (E), Social (S), and Governance (G).

ESG Risks Over Time

Before diving into the details, we looked into the main trends over the last few years in ESG trends. We found a detectable increase in the volume of ESG-related web mentions, with an emphasis on social risks. Especially since the start of 2020, social risks have been on a consistent upward trajectory. Notably, there was a significant spike in mentions around mid-2020 following mass protests amid the COVID-19 lockdown, in addition to reports of cyberattacks and allegations of sexual assault. Furthermore, 2021 saw an uptick in mentions related to issues of racism (Black Lives Matter movement) and homophobia.

ESG Risks: Focus 2023

We outlined the prominent risks in 2023: social risks, with layoffs and strikes gaining attention; environmental risks, marked by wildfires and oil spills; and governance risks, where tax evasion and ethical violations like bribery were in focus. Each risk category underscores the urgent issues facing society and the need for accountability and action.

Environmental Controversies of 2023

Environmental risks may not match the sheer number of mentions that social risks receive, but their presence in discussions has steadily grown over the year, particularly in the third quarter. Let's explore the most common controversies that have emerged.

Climate Change and Policy

Climate change dominated environmental discussions in 2023. A noticeable peak in mentions arose in the latter half of the year, particularly around heatwaves and debates surrounding climate policies.

Atmospheric Emissions

September saw increased discussions about atmospheric emissions, notably due to the emissions from volcanic eruptions,  hybrid cars, and the discovery of toxic metals in food products.

Impact on Biodiversity

The wildfires that spread in June sparked significant debates around their impact on biodiversity, leading to increased mentions and concerns related to environmental preservation.

Top 5 Environmental Controversies

These controversies are ranked by relative volume*.

• Marathon Petroleum
  

Volume of mentions: 62

Relative volume: 69%

A significant portion of environmental risk discussions surrounding Marathon Petroleum was due to its chemical leak in Garyville. This incident led to massive fires, so large they could be observed from space. (source)

• Nestlé
  

Volume of mentions: 30

Relative volume: 54%

Nestlé faced scrutiny in 2023, with over half of its environmental risk mentions associated with drought controversies. The company was urged to cease its water mining activities following severe droughts in France. (source)

• Coca-Cola
  

Volume of mentions: 178

Relative volume: 53%

Coca-Cola garnered attention due to a hydrochloric acid leak in January 2023, leading to significant environmental concerns. (source)

• ExxonMobil
  

Volume of mentions: 571

Relative volume: 31%

Exxon, along with Guyana’s environmental agency, was implicated in breaches of oil spill insurance policies. (source)

• Shell
  

Volume of mentions: 872

Relative volume: 23%

An oil spill from a Shell pipeline adversely affected farms and a river in a region of Nigeria already grappling with pollution. (source)

Social Controversies of 2023

Social risks have taken the forefront in 2023, with notable web mentions increasing significantly. Here are the most relevant controversial topics:

Social Dialogue

Social discourse intensified at the start of the year, with news of widespread strikes in various sectors, including aviation and education, primarily driven by pay disputes. The wave of layoffs in several tech companies was the talk of the town, especially during the first quarter of the year.

Respect for Human Rights

The year saw an uptick in mentions related to human rights, especially controversies surrounding racism, data privacy violations, sexual harassment, and breaches of GDPR.

Diversity and Inclusion

Discrimination against minority groups, including the LGBTQ community and people of color, and age-based discrimination became a significant topic of discussion in 2023.

Top 5 Social Controversies

These controversies are ranked by relative volume*.

• McDonald's
  

Volume of mentions: 8,903

Relative volume: 87%

McDonald's faced substantial social risks in 2023 due to significant layoffs of its corporate staff in April. The move led to public concern and discussions around the company's employment practices and stability. (source)

• Google
  

Volume of mentions: 13,504

Relative volume: 43%

Google found itself in the spotlight as it faced challenges related to major layoffs in January and October of 2023. These layoffs contributed to almost half of the social risk mentions associated with the tech giant. (source)

• Meta
  

Volume of mentions: 10,965

Relative volume: 38%

Meta, formerly known as Facebook, also faced scrutiny as 38% of the company's social risk mentions revolved around layoffs that took place in March and October 2023. (source)

• Microsoft
  

Volume of mentions: 6,060

Relative volume: 28%

Microsoft faced challenges due to disruptions caused by cyberattacks in early June. In addition, the company had to navigate through controversies related to layoffs, contributing to its social risks. (source)

• X (formerly Twitter)
  

Volume of mentions: 7,246

Relative volume: 8%

X/Twitter experienced a global outage, which was followed by significant layoffs. These events led to considerable public discussions and social risks for the company. (source)

Governance Controversies of 2023

Governance risks, though often overlooked, play a pivotal role in shaping corporate responsibility and ethical conduct. In 2023, several governance controversy trends emerged:

Money Laundering

Tax evasion was a major topic of discussion in the first quarter, highlighting the need for greater transparency and accountability within corporations.

Bribery

There was a significant increase in mentions related to bribery cases, underscoring the challenges in maintaining ethical governance standards.

Competitive Behavior

This year has witnessed a rise in competitive conduct controversies, with several companies being scrutinized. Antitrust violations, price manipulation, and digital advertising dominance are central to these disputes.

Top 5 Governance Controversies

These controversies are ranked by relative volume*.

• FTX
  

Volume of mentions: 8,085

Relative volume: 40%

FTX, a notable entity in the financial sector, found itself at the center of governance controversies. A significant portion of the discussions surrounding FTX's governance risks in 2023 pertained to allegations of its founder's involvement in bribery schemes. (source)

• Apple
  

Volume of mentions: 3,162

Relative volume: 28%

Apple, a tech giant, faced scrutiny as a third of its governance risk mentions revolved around antitrust violations reported in October 2023. (source)

• Microsoft
  

Volume of mentions: 4,429

Relative volume: 25%

Microsoft encountered legal challenges with its deal with Activision. The company had to approach the court to reject the FTC's request to halt the deal. (source)

• X (formerly Twitter)
  

Volume of mentions: 2,251

Relative volume: 18%

X/Twitter, another major player in the tech industry, faced legal challenges when a judge dismissed a shareholder lawsuit against Elon Musk concerning a Twitter buyout. (source)

• Google
  

Volume of mentions: 3,920

Relative volume: 13%

Google faced judicial sanctions for allegedly destroying evidence in an antitrust case, further emphasizing the critical governance challenges even major tech giants face. (source)

Conclusion

In conclusion, the year 2023 proved to be eventful in the ESG landscape. From environmental concerns sparked by significant events like chemical leaks and wildfires to social challenges such as widespread layoffs and discrimination and governance risks underscored by bribery and antitrust violations, the year offered a comprehensive view of the myriad challenges companies face in the modern era.

Understanding these controversies and the companies involved provides invaluable insights for stakeholders, especially in the private equity and asset management sectors. AI-driven ESG insights, like those provided by SESAMm, can be pivotal in navigating the ever-evolving ESG landscape, ensuring informed decision-making and proactive risk management.

Relative volume*: Relative to the total volume of E, S, or G risks for the company during the same period.

SESAMm’s AI Technology Reveals ESG Insights

Discover unparalleled insights into ESG controversies, risks, and opportunities across industries. Learn more about how SESAMm can help you analyze millions of private and public companies using AI-powered text analysis tools.