SESAMm’s AI-generated ESG Assessment Reports deliver fast, sharp insights into the ESG performance, risks, and controversies of leading global companies in under 30 minutes. Designed for investors, risk teams, and sustainability leaders, they surface the issues that matter most for due diligence and portfolio oversight. In this edition, we dive into LVMH, one of the world’s largest luxury groups, to see how its sustainability ambitions stack up against the challenges it faces. Explore the summary below or fill out the form to receive your own free AI-generated report.
ESG AI Screening Report Summary: LVMH
LVMH Louis Vuitton Moët Hennessy SE (LVMH) is a leading French multinational conglomerate in the luxury goods sector, with a diverse portfolio of 75 brands across fashion, wines, spirits, cosmetics, and more. Despite its strong market position, LVMH faces significant ESG challenges. A major red flag is the €8 million fine by the French Autorité des Marchés Financiers for failing to disclose its acquisition of a stake in Hermès, highlighting governance and transparency issues. The company has been criticized for environmental impacts, including deforestation linked to its leather supply chain and allegations of greenwashing. Social risks are also prominent, with labor exploitation cases in its supply chain and allegations of workplace harassment.
However, the luxury goods industry inherently faces severe ESG risks due to high scrutiny and frequent controversies, such as cultural appropriation and labor issues. LVMH's ESG reporting is comprehensive, with detailed disclosures on environmental and social initiatives, but the presence of significant controversies suggests a need for improved governance and transparency.
PARIS, FRANCE, March 1, 2023 — SESAMm, a leader in natural language processing (NLP), a field of artificial intelligence, today announced the close of a Series B2 funding round of €35 million (USD 37 million) to accelerate its ambitious growth and global expansion plans.
Securing this funding will enable SESAMm to further expand into U.S. and Asian markets, support technology development to generate AI-powered ESG and sentiment analytics, and hire key talent across sustainability, technology, sales, and marketing.
The Series B2 round was co-led by Elaia, a deep tech VC firm, and Opera Tech Ventures, the venture capital arm of BNP Paribas (BNPP). Other participating companies include asset manager Unigestion, Raiffeisen Bank International’s (RBI) venture capital entity Elevator Ventures, AFG Partners, CEGEE Capital, and historical backers, including Carlyle (CG) and New Alpha Asset Management, who participated in the previous Series B1 round. This latest round brings the total funding raised to €50 million.
“We are delighted to support SESAMm's ambitious journey to leverage deep technology and create actionable data insights on ESG analysis and monitoring. We are impressed by the quality and seniority of the executive team, already leading operations in every continent with anchor and Tier 1 clients. The vision of bringing technology to the Finance industry and the corporate world to empower with ESG insights is a game changer, and we are very excited to be part of the adventure by their side,” said Pauline Roux, Partner at Elaia.
“In a context where it is increasingly critical for decision makers to feed their assessments with deeper data points, we found SESAMm’s product very relevant to help identify, filter out, weigh, and report key data insights on companies ranging from small private firms to larger corporations. We have found deep common ground with the team and are very proud to support SESAMm in its journey onward,” said Thibaut Schlaeppi, Managing Director at Opera Tech Ventures.
SESAMm is one of the fastest-growing natural language analytics data providers, serving global investment firms such as top private equity firms, hedge funds, and other asset management companies, in addition to corporations of all sizes. Leveraging its data lake, which comprises more than 20 billion articles and grows by 20% per year, SESAMm provides datasets and NLP capabilities to generate innovative analytics for use cases such as controversy detection, ESG and SDG sentiment scores, private equity due diligence, suppliers monitoring, and more.
“Since we started working with SESAMm as investors and clients over two years ago, we’ve been impressed with both the company’s growth and the advanced analytics that have supported our deal sourcing, diligence, and portfolio company value creation efforts,” said Matt Anderson, Carlyle’s Chief Digital Officer. “We are delighted to build on our strong partnership with SESAMm by participating in this latest round.”
CEO Sylvain Forté, COO Pierre Rinaldi, and CTO Florian Aubry co-founded SESAMm in 2014. With their team of nearly 100 data experts, they leverage the vast amount of textual information on the web, from news websites to NGO reports and social media, to translate it into powerful, digestible, and actionable insights.
Sylvain Forté, CEO and Co-Founder of SESAMm, said, “We are happy and grateful to close this €35 million Series B2 round, a testament to the dedication of our entire team and the strength of SESAMm’s C-suite leadership – my cofounders Pierre Rinaldi COO & Florian Aubry CTO, Marie-Charlotte Deucher CFO, Jorge Alvarez CMO, and Eric Sionnet CDO – to continue our growth journey and expand to new international markets such as Singapore. Raising a significant amount during challenging market conditions highlights the relevancy of SESAMm's focus on two key trends: AI and sustainability. In turn, these tools enable organizations to make better decisions and fill the data gaps, particularly in ESG, on both public and private companies.”
About SESAMm
SESAMm is a leading artificial intelligence company serving global investment firms and corporations around the globe. SESAMm analyzes more than 20 billion documents in real-time to generate insights for controversy detection on investments, clients and suppliers, ESG and positive impact scores, private equity due diligence and sourcing, sentiment analysis on financial assets, and more.
About Elaia
Elaia is a venture capital firm specializing in funding early-stage technology companies. The firm focuses on software, internet, and digital media startups and has a strong track record of backing companies that become successful and profitable. Elaia's team includes experienced investors and entrepreneurs who provide valuable guidance and support to the startups in their portfolio. With a focus on helping companies scale and grow, Elaia is a valuable partner for any entrepreneur looking to launch a technology business.
About Opera Tech Ventures by BNP Paribas
Opera Tech Ventures is BNP Paribas’ VC arm, launched in 2018 with the objective to invest in startups that transform or disrupt the financial industry. The fund is managed by BNP Paribas Asset Management France, as part of its Private Assets division, dedicated to private asset management. With a global scope, Opera Tech Ventures supports entrepreneurs building ambitious ventures from Series A to Series C with investments ranging from 3 to €15m.
About Carlyle
Carlyle (NASDAQ: CG) is a global investment firm with deep industry expertise that deploys private capital across three business segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit, and Global Investment Solutions. With $373 billion of assets under management as of December 31, 2022, Carlyle’s purpose is to invest wisely and create value on behalf of its investors, portfolio companies, and the communities in which we live and invest. Carlyle employs more than 2,100 people in 29 offices across five continents. Further information is available at www.carlyle.com. Follow Carlyle on Twitter @OneCarlyle.
ESG frameworks and regulations have developed due to rising awareness of sustainability and supply chain risks. They aim to enhance transparency, accountability, and ethics, encouraging environmental preservation, social improvement, and better governance. While fostering innovation and financial benefits, aligning with sustainable development goals, these measures might increase costs for businesses, especially smaller ones. Differences across regions and a focus on compliance could inhibit real change, promoting a superficial 'tick-box' approach rather than significant enhancements.
This article takes an in-depth view of some of the most relevant recent regulations and analyzes how effective they seem to be.
Unraveling Supply Chain Regulations: From Past to Present
We traced the evolution of supply chain regulations from non-binding guidelines to binding laws, examining their impact on corporate sustainability. Along the way, we explored the challenges businesses face as they strive to comply with these constantly evolving standards.
Note: The list of regulations and frameworks mentioned is a high-level list of the most mentioned acts.
Global and Non-binding
When analyzing global and non-binding regulations, although they provide crucial frameworks for promoting corporate accountability by offering guidelines for responsible business conduct, they also have limitations. For instance, they lack legal enforceability due to their non-binding nature, potentially hindering compliance. Given the broad scope of the guidelines, implementation challenges arise, particularly in regions with weak governance.
Here are a few examples of recent sustainability regulations:
By Region and Binding
Binding legislation requires companies to meet specific standards in sustainability, environmental protection, and social responsibility. Non-compliance risks legal penalties and reputational damage. However, weak enforcement, insufficient penalties, and legal ambiguities often lead to criticism. Additionally, logistical and resource constraints, especially across borders, limit the effectiveness of regulatory bodies in monitoring and enforcing compliance. Furthermore, the penalties imposed are often disproportionately low. Moreover, these bodies depend on companies’ self-reporting without independent verification, leading to underreporting.
By Country/State and Binding
State or country legislation on supply chains encounters several challenges. These include jurisdictional limitations, enforcement difficulties due to resource constraints, and compliance burdens, especially for smaller businesses. Additionally, fragmented regulations across states or countries can complicate compliance for companies operating nationally. This underscores the importance of coordinated efforts between states and the federal government to address supply chain issues effectively. In addition, regulatory bodies contend with logistical and resource limitations, mainly when operating across borders, which can hinder their effectiveness in monitoring and enforcing compliance.
Unveiling Vulnerabilities Sector Screening for Supply Chain Controversies
In this section, we explore the evolving landscape of supply chain regulatory frameworks and ESG risks in supply chain management. We also dive into how future regulations will affect global trade, corporate responsibility, and sustainability efforts.
Supply Chain Controversies Over Time
We analyzed supply chain-related controversies from 2019 onwards and found a consistent increase each year, peaking in 2023. Concurrently, mentions of various frameworks, laws, and legislations [mentioned in Part I] related to these issues have also risen. Our analysis reveals a strong and positive correlation between the two trends (r=0.99), indicating a significant relationship. While the apparent increase in supply chain issues, breaches, and controversies may be concerning, it's largely caused by implementing more frameworks that increase visibility and accountability. Even without binding regulations, companies' reputations are affected. Thus, the proliferation of laws and frameworks contributes to the heightened online attention to these breaches.
Supply Chain Controversies: An ESG Analysis
For this analysis, we primarily focused on environmental and social issues within the supply chain, as legislation often targets these areas due to their significant external impacts. Issues like environmental damage and labor violations are most likely to occur in the supply chain and can profoundly affect communities and ecosystems. Governance issues, on the other hand, are more internal and directly pertain to a company's operations and management practices. Therefore, we analyzed a sample of 31,011 entities across industries with frequent mentions of ESG-related supply chain risks, focusing on social and environmental risks.
Specialized Retail has the highest incidence of social and environmental controversies, followed by Technology Software and Automobile & Components, respectively. As shown in the graph above, many of the issues highlighted in the Social ESG supply chain pillar are driven by human and labor rights breaches, which significantly contribute to the ESG risks mentioned.
Social Risks in the Supply Chain
In specialized retail, many brands face scrutiny for alleged forced labor; some examples include Amazon, Hugo Boss, Diesel, and Costco. Additionally, Amazon garnered widespread attention when the company settled a $1.9 million human rights abuse claim. Consumer groups sued Starbucks over deceptive ethical sourcing claims linked to human rights issues. Walmart and Centric were also investigated for human rights violations. Moreover, reports tie Amazon and IKEA suppliers to forced labor. These controversies dominate ESG supply chain discussions in retail.
Regarding the other industries, we also see that technology hardware displays a significant proportion of mentions stemming from mentions of forced labor for Lenovo, Cisco, and Intel, and numerous controversies regarding Apple, among many other allegations.
Similarly, Companies from the food and beverage manufacturers industry were also linked with human rights violations and infringements on labor rights, with companies like Tyson Foods, McDonald's, Hershey, Pepsi, and Nestle having multiple supplier issues connected with child labor, discrimination, and exploitative work. While Technology Software companies mentions were primarily related to contractors and content moderators’ health & safety issues and labor rights infringements from companies like Meta, Microsoft, and Google.
In sum, the evolving supply chain regulations reflect a global commitment to sustainability and ethical business practices. Navigating these regulations presents challenges and opportunities for businesses to lead in corporate responsibility and advance principles of environmental stewardship and social equity. Embracing these regulations as a compass rather than a constraint can help chart a course toward a sustainable future.
Reach out to SESAMm
TextReveal’s web data analysis of over five million public and private companies is essential for keeping tabs on ESG investment risks. To learn more about how you can analyze web data or to request a demo, reach out to one of our representatives.
Alternative Data | Risk Management | Sentiment Analysis
Wednesday, September 14, 2022, a16z (Andreessen Horowitz), a large, well-known VC firm, funded Flow, a new startup led by a seemingly scandalous entrepreneur, Adam Neumann, the founder infamously known to have been ousted as WeWork CEO.
Why did a16z invest in Flow and, by proxy, Adam Neumann?
In his blog post about “Investing in Flow,” Andreessen acknowledges the U.S. housing crisis in the first sentence, and here’s what he has to say about Neumann: “Adam is a visionary leader who revolutionized the second largest asset class in the world—commercial real estate—by bringing community and brand to an industry in which neither existed before.” Andreessen continues, “[I]t’s often underappreciated that only one person has fundamentally redesigned the office experience and led a paradigm-changing global company in the process.”
So that gives us a clue as to what Andreessen thinks. But what does the public web have to say, and what is its overall sentiment?
In this edition of Alternative Data Trends, we dig into public web data before, during, and after a16z announced that it would fund Flow. Does the public web agree with Andreesen’s view? If not, how does it differ? And how can this information inform an investor and other VC firms?
Let’s find out.
a16z web mention volume and polarity (Nov. 2015 to Jun. 2022)
Figure 1: Andreessen Horowitz mention volume and polarity chart.
Mention volumes spike in mid-June 2021
TextReveal® uncovered 181,620 articles and messages from SESAMm’s data lake about Andreessen Horowitz (Figure 1). Mention volume remains consistent until late 2020, at which time a16z invests in a bunch of new companies and startups, such as:
Beacons
Clubhouse
Dapper Labs
Eco
Helium
Labster
Maven
Nansen
OpenSea
Skydio
SpotOn
Tackle.io
Valon
Zus Health
a16z also focused on the NFT market and, as a result, launched the world’s biggest crypto-fund valued at $2.2 Billion in June 2021. Moreover, Andreessen Horowitz launched its own media property, Future.com, in mid-2021.
Andreessen Horowitz web mentions further spike after it doubles down, announcing $4.5B crypto fund IV in May 2022. Additional news increased mention volume because of its investment in Neumann’s new startups, Flowcarbon and Flow.
Polarity (positive and negative sentiment) dips
Sentiment toward a16z remained relatively stable over time with only minor dips until mid-2021, when it began falling, a trend driven by mentions of Flow investments news, the Uniswap related lawsuit, and suspected CoinSwitch Forex law violations (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Uniswap and CoinSwitch events affected a16z’s polarity as early as July 2022. As it rebounded, Flow began influencing polarity negatively by mid-August.
Why was Flow affecting a16z’s polarity so much?
Figure 3: Newsclips about a16z investing in Flow.
Despite Andreessen’s reasons for giving Flow and Neumann a chance, the public’s opinion seems to disagree, leaning toward a negative sentiment (Figure 3). Overall, the public doesn’t seem to trust that Neumann is worth a second chance and that his choices are beyond forgiving. Moreover, the public criticizes a16z’s choice to overlook women and people of color. This The Guardian article highlights tweets of these differences in opinion:
In summary, TextReveal’s web data analysis tells us that it’s essential to keep an eye on the latent ESG risks this investment could bring to a16z’s portfolio, particularly on the social side.
Andreessen Horowitz, from an ESG perspective
a16z ESG initiatives
Figure 4: a16z’s governance initiatives exceed environmental and social.
From a mention volume perspective, a16z’s ESG initiative numbers remain stable (Figure 4). Andreessen Horowitz has a good share of ESG initiatives shares with the highest percentage for governance driven by partnerships and collaborations, followed by the environmental aspect that has been increasing over the last two years.
ESG risks, from a portfolio perspective
Figure 5: a16z’s aggregated portfolio’s ESG risks over time.
Figure 6: a16z’s portfolio’s social risk spikes in January 2020.
Figures 5 and 6 cover 160 companies in Andreessen Horowitz’s portfolio in the venture and growth stage. Overall, a16z’s portfolio represents a lower ESG risk (<15%) over time, except for the occasional moderately higher ESG risks score (<35%) indicated by two prominent spikes, one at the end of 2016 (Q4) and the second at the beginning of the year 2020 during the pandemic (Q1). The first spike is mainly a governance risk related to Soylent’s products being recalled and supply-chain-shortage risks. The spike is also caused by another top executive resigning from Magic Leap. In contrast, the second spike is a social risk driven by Instacart’s employees’ strike upon working conditions and safety concerns during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Note: Very low risk is <5%, low risk is <15%, moderate risk is <=35%, high risk is <=50%, and very high risk is >50%. Also, note that this scale is for demonstration only and does not indicate actual risk values.
Figure 7: A deeper look into the top companies in a16z’s portfolio generating mention volumes shows Instacart and MakerDAO in the moderate risk range. In contrast, the others are low to very low in risk in comparison.
Does the public’s view of a16z’s investment of Flow have merit?
Maybe, maybe not.
Looking at Andreessen Horowitz’s company and portfolio through the lens of web data, it is, if anything, consistent with its ESG initiatives and has experienced very few controversies. Should investors ignore the potential red flags that come with Flow and Adam Neumann? Of course not. But they should feel assured that a16z has exhibited a pattern of making sound investments. For example, if we compare the firm’s SDG initiatives to those in its portfolio (Figure 8), they are almost identical.
Figure 8: Andreessen Horowitz portfolio companies are focusing on the Sustainable Development Goals with specific attention toward goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure and Goal 17: Partnerships for the Goals, followed by Goal 4: Quality Education and Goal 15: Life On Land.
It’s possible that maybe Marc Andreessen and a16z et al. see something in Flow that the general public does not. After all, it’s why they’re a successful venture capital firm that consistently “backs bold entrepreneurs building the future through technology,” controversies and all.