SESAMm’s AI-generated ESG Assessment Reports deliver fast, sharp insights into the ESG performance, risks, and controversies of leading global companies in under 30 minutes. Designed for investors, risk teams, and sustainability leaders, they surface the issues that matter most for due diligence and portfolio oversight. In this edition, we dive into LVMH, one of the world’s largest luxury groups, to see how its sustainability ambitions stack up against the challenges it faces. Explore the summary below or fill out the form to receive your own free AI-generated report.

ESG AI Screening Report Summary: LVMH

LVMH Louis Vuitton Moët Hennessy SE (LVMH) is a leading French multinational conglomerate in the luxury goods sector, with a diverse portfolio of 75 brands across fashion, wines, spirits, cosmetics, and more. Despite its strong market position, LVMH faces significant ESG challenges. A major red flag is the €8 million fine by the French Autorité des Marchés Financiers for failing to disclose its acquisition of a stake in Hermès, highlighting governance and transparency issues. The company has been criticized for environmental impacts, including deforestation linked to its leather supply chain and allegations of greenwashing. Social risks are also prominent, with labor exploitation cases in its supply chain and allegations of workplace harassment.

On the positive side, LVMH claims robust environmental targets, such as a 55.1% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2024, and significant investments in renewable energy. The company is a signatory of the UN Global Compact, indicating a commitment to international sustainability standards.

However, the luxury goods industry inherently faces severe ESG risks due to high scrutiny and frequent controversies, such as cultural appropriation and labor issues. LVMH's ESG reporting is comprehensive, with detailed disclosures on environmental and social initiatives, but the presence of significant controversies suggests a need for improved governance and transparency.

Over the past decade, many organizations have improved their carbon footprints, from recyclable and biodegradable packaging and single-use plastic to planting trees and reducing their greenhouse gas emissions. However, some businesses and companies looking to boost their eco-friendly image without committing to serious changes and addressing environmental issues have been associated with false green marketing. We call this "Greenwashing."

What is Greenwashing?

Greenpeace and the Environmental Protection Agency define greenwashing as making false and misleading claims about a product's environmental benefits or practices, services, technology, or company practices. Greenwashing typically involves companies spending more money on advertising and marketing than on implementing sustainable business practices that minimize environmental impact. These false green claims can deceive consumers into believing that a product or company is more environmentally friendly than it is, leading to increased sales and profits. As a result, false advertising, misleading initiatives, and groundless claims have increased green investors' exposure to risks emerging from potential lawsuits from activist groups, image deterioration, and some heavy loss in assets invested.

Why is Spotting Greenwashing Important?

Greenwashing is a growing concern for investors as they look to make sustainable and responsible investments. Therefore, spotting greenwashing practices is important for these firms. Here's why.

The deceptive practices used by greenwashers can have significant implications for the integrity of investments made in what investors believe to be sustainably operated companies or sustainable funds. In other words, greenwashing makes it difficult for investors to distinguish between genuinely committed to sustainability companies and those merely making false claims about their environmental practices. As a result, investors may unknowingly invest in companies that are not as sustainable as they claim to be, which can harm their financial returns and the environment. Therefore, it's essential for investors to be aware of greenwashing tactics and to carefully research companies before investing in them to ensure that their investments align with their values and contribute to a more sustainable future.

What Are the Challenges to Detecting Greenwashing?

It's challenging to produce an accurate assessment of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, which gives companies the opportunity to cover or hide ineffective and fake green initiatives.
According to Regtank, some of the main challenges to detecting greenwashing practices are the following:

• Lack of reporting standards: some investors believe that we haven’t universally agreed upon a set of standards to determine whether a product is ESG compliant.
  
• Lack of transparency: greenwashing companies don’t disclose the specificities of their “green campaigns,” which makes it difficult for investors and consumers to fact-check and evaluate their sustainability claims.
• Limited consumer awareness: false marketing strategies could be based on a combination of the consumer’s eco-consciousness and brand loyalty. As a result, consumers become less aware of the misleading strategies greenwashing companies use to sell their products.

Ultimately, these factors may contribute to the inaccuracy and limitations of ESG data and scores, which makes it easier for greenwashers to get away with their false marketing campaigns. Consequently, detecting greenwashing requires scrutiny of environmental claims made by companies and an understanding of the complex supply chains and manufacturing processes involved in producing products and services.

To learn more about greenwashing and have access to real-life case studies, download this comprehensive report:

How Does Artificial Intelligence Detect Greenwashing?

As greenwashing practices increase, activist investors, experts, journalists, and even the general public are spreading awareness of the issue using social media, news outlets, forums, and blogs, among other means.
Recently, artificial intelligence (AI), particularly natural language processing (NLP), has proven to be effective in the early detection of greenwashing by analyzing vast amounts of qualitative data publicly available on the web. At SESAMm, for example, we apply our NLP capabilities to identify companies likely to engage in greenwashing practices by analyzing text in billions of web-based articles. Our data lake contains over 25 billion web–sourced articles, sourced from four million news, blogs, social media, and forum discussions on five million public and private companies in more than 100 languages. We run these articles through our AI platform tool, TextReveal®, and systematically craft reliable, timely, and comprehensive insights to detect greenwashing, generate ESG alerts, and identify related risks.

The Rise of Greenwashing

Greenwashing, the deceptive practice where companies claim to be more environmentally friendly than they actually are, has become a growing concern in recent years. By analyzing the frequency of web mentions of greenwashing over time, we can observe important trends and understand the factors contributing to this phenomenon.

Recent analyses indicate a significant increase in greenwashing mentions since late 2019. This rise aligns with a growing public awareness of the climate emergency and the increase in media outlets and social media accounts dedicated to exposing greenwashing. The number of mentions escalated from fewer than 200 to over 23,000 in the last quarter of 2023, highlighting the increasing scrutiny of corporate environmental claims.

A noteworthy pattern is the regular occurrence of spikes in greenwashing mentions during the third quarter over the past three years. This timing corresponds with the "pre-COP" periods, leading to critical international climate change management conferences. These periods see heightened discussions around sustainability, with increased attention on companies' environmental practices.

Greenwashing in the Energy Sector

The energy sector, particularly the oil industry, has faced significant scrutiny regarding greenwashing. In this context, companies like Shell and ENI have been prominent due to the frequency of greenwashing mentions associated with them.

For Shell and ENI, the volume of greenwashing mentions has fluctuated, with notable increases in specific quarters. For example, Shell saw spikes in mentions during the second quarter of both 2021 and 2022 while experiencing a drop in the third quarter of 2022. ENI has faced similar fluctuations, often linked to legal actions and publicized environmental issues.

Shell's Greenwashing Mentions, ESG Risks, and Initiatives

Shell, a British multinational and prominent player in this sector, has faced considerable scrutiny for such practices. The company has experienced notable spikes in greenwashing mentions and has been involved in several ESG-related risks.

Greenwashing Mentions

We can see an increase in greenwashing mentions in the first half of 2023. Around that period, Shell faced allegations and lawsuits concerning its environmental claims. The company was criticized for misleading U.S. authorities and investors about its energy transition efforts. Additionally, Shell faced public backlash for labeling fossil gas as 'renewable' while reporting record profits. A notable incident involved a shareholder suing Shell's executives over climate risks.

ESG Risks

Shell has faced several ESG-related risks, including legal challenges and pollution issues. In 2021, the company was sued by New York City over climate change-related advertising and filed an arbitration claim against Nigeria concerning a spill dispute. In March 2023, Shell faced another oil spill, this time in another region in Nigeria,  Rivers State, and also saw institutional investors backing a lawsuit against its board over climate risks. The mid-2023 period saw Shell agreeing to pay $10 million for air pollution violations at a Pennsylvania petrochemical plant. Despite its net-zero pledge, the company announced plans to increase fossil fuel production.

ESG Initiatives

Despite its challenges, Shell has also engaged in various sustainability initiatives. In late 2021, the company announced plans to purchase power from the world's largest offshore wind farm. Mid-2022 saw a leadership change with the company's CEO stepping down as Shell aimed to align with its climate goals. The company also planned to deploy 10,000 EV chargers across India as part of its global strategy. In mid-2023, Shell committed to investing $10–15 billion in developing low-carbon energy solutions. Although the company abandoned its lower oil production target, it maintained its commitment to reducing emissions.

Shell's journey underscores the challenges of aligning environmental claims with real actions, emphasizing the importance of transparency and genuine sustainability efforts.

ENI's Greenwashing Mentions, ESG Risks, and Initiatives

ENI, an Italian multinational oil and gas company, has faced scrutiny for such practices. The company has experienced fluctuations in greenwashing mentions and has been involved in a number of ESG-related risks.

Greenwashing Mentions

ENI's greenwashing mentions are fairly low. However, the company has been featured in discussions about greenwashing, especially with recent developments. In early 2022, the company faced criticism for inconsistencies in emissions data and greenwashing activities, as highlighted by the Sereno Regis Study Center. Greenpeace also criticized ENI for using the Sanremo Music Festival as a platform for greenwashing. In May 2023, ENI faced a lawsuit for allegedly lobbying and greenwashing to promote fossil fuels despite being aware of their environmental risks. Greenpeace sued the company, accusing it of knowingly contributing to climate change.

ESG Risks

Over the past 4 years, the oil giant's ESG risks have been few but not inexistent. ENI has encountered several risks, including legal challenges and pollution issues. In 2022, ENI's environmental strategy was deemed a failure, and concerns arose about a pipeline spill into the East Irish Sea. The company also faced legal actions in 2021, including an appeal against a court ruling in an illegal waste case and warnings from the Legality Network to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or face prosecution.

The company faced a lawsuit in early 2023 for allegedly having prior knowledge of the climate crisis. In another incident, a report found that ENI and Shell were responsible for significant pollution in Bayelsa, requiring a $12 billion cleanup.

ESG Initiatives

Despite facing ESG risks, it is visible that ENI has also pursued various sustainability initiatives. In early 2022, ENI and British Petroleum finalized an agreement to create a new independent joint venture in Angola, which will support the energy needs of Angola's growing economy and its decarbonization path and strengthen its role as a global LNG player. In late 2023, the company received Gold Standard recognition from the United Nations for its commitment to reducing methane emissions. ENI also partnered with Luiss University to launch an international network focused on African energy transition and collaborated with RINA to accelerate maritime decarbonization.
ENI has shown interest in renewable energy, as demonstrated by its wave energy project in Pantelleria and its plans for fusion energy in collaboration with Commonwealth Fusion Systems. The company also focuses on sustainable mobility, developing diesel from 100% renewable materials, and promoting clean energy through partnerships.

Shell and ENI both face the challenge of balancing economic interests with environmental responsibility. Despite allegations of greenwashing and environmental risks, both companies have taken steps towards sustainability, such as investing in low-carbon solutions and renewable energy projects. Their experiences highlight the importance of transparency, genuine commitment to environmental responsibility, and the role of public scrutiny in holding companies accountable.

Greenwashing and ESG Investing

In sum, certain companies advertise their sustainability and green initiatives, while in reality, they are making false claims and practicing greenwashing, as evidenced by our analysis using SESAMm's AI and ESG reports. We use AI through TextReveal to generate alternative data for use cases, such as ESG and SDG, sentiment, private equity due diligence, corporate studies, and more. Our technologies can reliably ensure the credibility of ecological initiatives and serve global investment firms, corporations, and investors, such as private equity firms, hedge funds, and other asset management firms, to enhance their investment strategies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the issue of greenwashing represents a substantial obstacle in the journey towards genuine environmental sustainability, misleading consumers and investors and diluting the efforts of genuine sustainable enterprises. Nevertheless, the emergence of advanced technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) indicated a new era of accountability. Innovators like SESAMm are at the forefront, deploying these technologies to effectively unravel and counteract greenwashing practices. This empowers investors, asset, and portfolio managers to discern and align their resources with legitimately sustainable entities. The call to action is clear: a collective demand for transparency and responsibility is crucial.

Reach out to SESAMm

TextReveal’s web data analysis of over five million public and private companies is essential for keeping tabs on ESG investment risks. To learn more about how you can analyze web data or to request a demo, reach out to one of our representatives.

Greenwashing in ESG has become harder to detect, not easier, because the corporate playbook has matured. Claims are vaguer, disclosure is more selective. Meanwhile, two adjacent problems have grown up next to it: greenwishing and greenhushing. The biggest greenwashing risk in your portfolio probably isn't the company you suspect, it's the one you don't. This guide is about all three, and how AI surfaces them at the speed your investment process needs.

Over the past decade, many organizations have improved their carbon footprints, from recyclable and biodegradable packaging and single-use plastic to planting trees and reducing their greenhouse gas emissions. However, some businesses and companies looking to boost their eco-friendly image without committing to serious changes and addressing environmental issues have been associated with false green marketing. We call this "Greenwashing."

Defining Concepts

What is Greenwashing?

Greenwashing is a practice used by businesses to represent themselves as more sustainable than they truly are. Greenpeace and the Environmental Protection Agency define greenwashing as making false and misleading claims about a product's environmental benefits or practices, services, technology, or company practices. Greenwashing typically involves companies spending more money on advertising and marketing than on implementing sustainable business practices that minimize environmental impact. These false green claims can deceive consumers into believing that a product or company is more environmentally friendly than it is, leading to increased sales and profits. As a result, false advertising, misleading initiatives, and groundless claims have increased green investors' exposure to risks emerging from potential lawsuits from activist groups, image deterioration, and heavy losses in assets invested.

In recent years, new concepts have emerged alongside greenwashing:

• Greenhushing refers to a company’s refusal to publicize ESG information. The company may fear pushback from stakeholders who would find its sustainability efforts lacking or from investors who believe ESG undermines returns.
• Greenwishing, or unintentional greenwashing, describes a practice where a company hopes to meet certain sustainability commitments but simply does not have the means to do so.

High-Profile Greenwashing Case Studies

When talking about greenwashing, the usual suspects are the oil and gas industry, the food and beverage sector, and other environmentally impactful industries. However, the financial industry has also been embroiled in its own greenwashing controversies.

DWS Greenwashing Analysis

DWS Group has been at the center of repeated greenwashing allegations. In April 2025, the firm was fined €25 million by German prosecutors for misleading ESG claims, building on years of scrutiny. It all started in 2021 with whistleblower claims that DWS overstated its ESG credentials, triggering investigations by both U.S. and German authorities. A police raid in June 2022 led to the CEO’s resignation, and in 2023, the SEC fined DWS $25 million for ESG misstatements. Lawsuits in Germany also allege false advertising around ESG. Greenpeace condemned DWS’s ESG bonus scheme as cosmetic rather than meaningful. Despite public commitments to sustainability, these controversies underscore a pattern of overstated ESG practices designed to attract investors.

BNY Mellon Greenwashing Analysis

BNY Mellon faced similar regulatory action. In May 2022, the SEC fined BNY Mellon Investment Adviser, Inc. $1.5 million for misleading statements about ESG integration in mutual funds. Although the funds were marketed as ESG-focused, the SEC found that BNY Mellon failed to apply ESG quality review as consistently as claimed, raising concerns about greenwashing in the financial sector.

The Challenges of Detecting Greenwashing

It’s challenging to produce an accurate assessment of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, which creates opportunities for companies to hide ineffective and fake green initiatives. According to Regtank, the main challenges to detecting greenwashing include:

• Lack of reporting standards – There’s no universal set of standards for ESG compliance.
• Lack of transparency – Companies often don’t disclose the specifics of their “green campaigns,” making it hard for investors and consumers to verify their claims.
• Limited consumer awareness – Misleading marketing can exploit consumers’ eco-consciousness and brand loyalty, reducing scrutiny of false green claims.
  

These gaps lead to inaccurate ESG data and scores, allowing greenwashers to avoid accountability. Ultimately, detecting greenwashing requires careful scrutiny of company claims and a deep understanding of their supply chains and operations.

How Artificial Intelligence Detects Greenwashing

As greenwashing practices become more common, activist investors, journalists, and the general public are using social media, news outlets, and blogs to highlight false claims. Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an invaluable tool in the early detection of greenwashing by analyzing vast amounts of public data.

At SESAMm, we use generative AI and LLMs to identify greenwashing risks across billions of web-based articles. Our data lake covers over 25 billion articles in more than 100 languages from four million news sources, blogs, social media platforms, and forums, analyzing data on five million public and private companies. Through our AI platform, we generate reliable, timely, and comprehensive insights to detect greenwashing, monitor ESG controversies, and identify related risks.

The Regulatory Landscape

The rise of greenwashing is not going unnoticed by regulators, as frameworks like the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) directly target misleading sustainability claims and hollow marketing.

1. The CSRD significantly strengthens the requirements for companies to substantiate their sustainability commitments. Mandating standardized and detailed ESG disclosures directly addresses the practice of greenwashing, where companies exaggerate their environmental credentials in marketing without meaningful follow-through. Under the CSRD, companies can no longer rely on vague or selectively presented data—any gaps or inconsistencies in their sustainability claims will be exposed in public filings, making greenwashing much riskier. This means an end to cherry-picked data and a shift toward more comprehensive, comparable, and verifiable ESG performance for investors and stakeholders.
2. The CSDDD (if it stands) further reinforces these efforts by obligating companies to go beyond marketing statements and prove they’re actively managing environmental and human rights impacts throughout their supply chains. This directive closes loopholes that greenwashing often exploits, such as highlighting only direct operations while ignoring supplier practices. By requiring due diligence on environmental impacts across the value chain, the CSDDD aims to turn sustainability from a branding exercise into a legal and operational priority. If real supply chain actions don’t support a company’s green claims, it could face legal action and reputational damage.

Looking Ahead

Looking ahead, greenwashing will continue to face intense scrutiny from regulators, investors, and the public. With evolving regulatory frameworks like CSRD and CSDDD, the pressure is on for companies to ensure genuine environmental responsibility—not just green advertising. At SESAMm, we believe that the combination of regulatory rigor and advanced AI technologies will play a critical role in uncovering false green claims and supporting investors in navigating ESG risks with greater transparency and accountability.

SESAMm’s AI Technology Reveals ESG Insights

Discover unparalleled insights into ESG controversies, risks, and opportunities across industries. Learn more about how SESAMm can help you analyze millions of private and public companies using AI-powered text analysis tools.