Replay Webinar: De-risking Portfolios: A Proactive Approach to Supply Chain Sustainability
08/25/2025
•
5 mins read
As scrutiny of corporate supply chains intensifies, investors are demanding more than policy statements and third-party audits. In this webinar, SESAMm and Inrate explore two powerful lenses for evaluating risks and sustainability impacts across global supplier networks: SESAMm’s real-time controversy detection and Inrate’s impact-driven sustainability data and ratings. Together, these approaches cover both public and private companies, go beyond self-disclosures, and enable assessments across a wide range of suppliers.
Watch this instant replay to dive into:
Emerging trends shaping how investors assess ESG risks and impacts across supply chains
The expanding role of AI in identifying hidden exposures and mapping sustainability outcomes
Proven strategies for combining controversy signals, ESG ratings, and emissions data to drive more informed decisions
Watch the Replay
De-risking Portfolios: A Proactive Approach to Supply Chain Sustainability
The e-scooter and e-bike rental industry is grappling with significant ESG risks, driven by regulatory challenges, financial instability, and safety concerns.
Lime, Bird, and Voi face challenges in environmental sustainability, particularly regarding waste management and scooter lifecycles. They also deal with social risks, such as accidents and legal issues related to safety, prompting cities like Madrid and Paris to impose bans or regulations. Regulatory compliance remains difficult, as seen with Voi's license revocations in Brussels. Additionally, Bird filed for bankruptcy in 2024 amid financial struggles, reflecting broader industry issues.
To top it off, the industry is also under pressure to adopt more responsible governance practices, including addressing labor conditions, consumer rights, and transparency in operations.
What are the most pressing ESG challenges currently facing the electric scooter rental sector? Read to find out.
Lime: Confronting Safety, Legal, and Environmental Challenges
Lime has faced significant ESG risks, including scrutiny over safety and maintenance issues related to its scooters, which have resulted in lawsuits and fines from local authorities like TfL and Brent Council. Environmental concerns arise from accusations of e-bikes being dumped in rivers. The company also struggles with legal troubles, facing sanctions in Andalucía and disputes over permits in Brussels and Madrid. Financially, Lime has exited several markets and laid off 14% of its staff, highlighting its vulnerabilities in governance, environmental, and social responsibilities.
Bird has been facing significant ESG risks following its 2024 Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to severe financial issues, resulting in market exits, layoffs, and scooter scrapping. Legal challenges include lawsuits over scooter misuse in Denver and a class action in Austria over unfair liability clauses. Safety concerns in cities like Zaragoza and Málaga have led to revoked operating licenses, while maintenance issues and parking violations in Freeport and Appleton have harmed their reputation. Despite restructuring efforts, Bird’s recovery path is uncertain, exposing it to long-term governance, operational, and environmental risks.
Voi Technology faces significant ESG risks linked to financial issues and regulatory challenges. In 2024, the company laid off 120 employees to improve profitability. It is disputing the termination of its scooter service in Seville and license revocations in Brussels and Bremen. Ties to sanctioned Russian oligarch Alexei Mordashov have raised scrutiny in cities like Liverpool and Bristol. Additionally, the company is facing consumer complaints about misleading advertising and safety issues, including a scooter fire in Bristol.
The electric scooter and e-bike rental industry faces significant ESG challenges that place its future sustainability and growth on shaky ground. Companies like Lime, Bird, and Voi must address regulatory compliance, safety concerns, and financial instability to regain public trust. By prioritizing responsible governance, enhancing safety measures, and demonstrating commitment to environmental stewardship, these firms can pave the way for a future where micromobility thrives as a safe and sustainable transportation option.
Reach out to SESAMm
TextReveal’s web data analysis of over five million public and private companies is essential for keeping tabs on ESG investment risks. To learn more about how you can analyze web data or to request a demo, reach out to one of our representatives.
November 11, 2022, FTX, a $32 billion cryptocurrency exchange company that many believed would “change the world,” filed for bankruptcy. This news shook the crypto and financial communities, compelling many to debate the future of the crypto market and its platforms.
How did FTX collapse?
You could say that FTX’s collapse began before the news broke, but here’s a summary of events as The New York Times and ABC News details:
Breaking news
In early November, CoinDesk, a crypto publication, broke the news on a leaked document from FTX. The balance sheet showed that the hedge fund run by Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), Alameda Research, held a substantial amount of FTT tokens. In short, SBF had set up Alameda (his trading firm) and FTX (his exchange firm) in such a way that if one unit experienced trouble, such as dropping cryptocurrency prices, the other experienced it, too.
First domino falls
By the way, FTT is used for various functions, including traders’ payment of operation fees. Also, by the way, Changpeng Zhao, Binance’s Chief Executive, sold his stake in FTX to SBF in 2021, partially with FTT. So, “due to recent revelations,” Binance (Zhao) announced on November 6, 2022, that it would sell its FTT tokens.
Other dominos follow
Traders responded; they hurried to pull funds out of FTX out of fear, and FTT’s price fell. Meanwhile, FTX processed withdrawal requests over three days, amounting to an estimated $6 billion. The liquidity crunch was upon it.
Then, on November 8, Binance said it would bail out FTX. But on November 9, Binance backtracked and announced in a Tweet that it would not “as a result of corporate due diligence,” while also citing regulatory investigations and reports of mishandled funds.
Things get worse
The next day, November 10, the Securities Commission of the Bahamas froze FTX’s assets, citing the public statement about potentially “mishandled” and “mismanaged” customer funds. On November 11, FTX filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protections, and SBF resigned as CEO. John J. Ray III—famously known as the CEO who headed the infamously known energy company, Enron, through its collapse in the 2000s—replaced SBF on November 17.
Fallout
Today, FTX faces federal investigation for securities laws violations based on a report by The Wall Street Journal regarding FTX lending customer deposits to Alameda Research for liabilities, of which the company’s top executives were aware. Investors have suffered loss, traders have suffered loss, and the greater crypto community and regulators are asking questions.
FTX and SBF web data analysis
News about FTX’s collapse generated tons of web data for us to scour. With this data, here’s what we aimed to find out:
How did the public web react to FTX’s collapse?
Could we have seen red flags before the news broke?
What was FTX’s collapse’s effect on the cryptocurrency market’s sentiment?
Is it possible to evaluate cryptocurrency exchange companies’ ESG risks and opportunities?
Was FTX’s collapse unprecedented? If not, what does web data tell us about that?
FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried mentions analysis
Web public sentiment for FTX and SBF was consistently positive until Q1 of 2022. As mentions volume increased, their sentiment polarity decreased (Figure 1). The mentions spike for both in November when CoinDesk broke the news. Likewise, polarity dips into the negative range for both.
Definition: Polarity represents the aggregate of positive and negative sentiments (opinions or reviews) on a company. A 0 score means there is as much positive as negative sentiment expressed. The dotted and dashed lines represent sentiment in the following charts.
Figure 1: FTX and SBF mentions and sentiment over time.
Looking closer at Q1 (Figure 2), we find that mentions affecting sentiment increased for FTX and SBF during this period. What are the mentions about, and why did they affect polarity negatively?
Figure 2: FTX and SBF pre-bankruptcy mentions and sentiment.
It turns out that SBF is linked to other keywords—we call these co-mentions—and between January 2022 and November 2022, SBF/withdrawal co-mentions (Figure 3) spiked in July when SBF defended Terra Luna’s founder, who was accused of peddling a Ponzi scheme.
Figure 3: FTX and SBF withdrawal co-mentions.
If withdrawal co-mentions brought up possible reasons why SBF and FTX experienced dips in sentiment, what other co-mentions could give us more insight? How about donations, SEC, and U.S. elections?
Figure 4: Donations, SEC, and U.S. elections co-mentions with SBF.
Corporate governance stands out when evaluating SBF’s ESG risks, but his social risks are nothing to ignore either.
Figure 5: SBF governance risks over time.
Two areas of governance risks to note are money laundering and board of directors (Figure 5). Money laundering as a co-mention has been an issue as early as February 2022, but it became a bigger issue in October. These risks may be popping up due to allegations of manipulating the price of the APT token and a securities violations probe.
If you’ve read this far, you by now get an impression of FTX and SBF, from mention volume to sentiment analysis and ESG risk. But how did FTX’s collapse affect the overall cryptocurrency market? Let’s find out.
In comparing the sentiment polarities for FTX and the crypto market from January 2021 through November 2022 (Figure 6), the sentiment for crypto remains relatively steady despite FTX’s sentiment taking a hit.
Figure 6: Effect of FTX collapse on the crypto market.
When comparing other cryptocurrency exchanges to FTX (Figure 7), sentiment polarity for them is hardly affected, except Binance, because of its connection with FTX. Oddly enough, eToro experienced a boost in sentiment, possibly because of its core values around openness and transparency, the fact that they’ve been around since 2007, its early compliance with regulations (i.e., AMF, FCA, ASIC, BaFin, and ACPR), and that it also proposes investing in stocks and ETFs, a contrast to most other crypto market exchanges. Bitfinex has its own issues, so its dip in sentiment might not be correlated.
Figure 7: FTX sentiment comparison across competitors.
At this time, FTX’s ESG risks based on the mention volume are only surpassed by Bitfinex (Figure 8), which its risks are based on many other reasons we won’t get into in this article.
Figure 8: FTX and competitors ESG risks by mention volume.
Centralized vs. decentralized crypto exchange platforms
FTX’s collapse also affected sentiment around the centralized vs. decentralized debate. Since October 2022, sentiment for centralized exchange platforms, such as FTX and its competitors, has fallen (Figure 9).
Figure 9: Centralized vs. decentralized mentions and sentiment over time.
Likewise, the mention volume for self-custody has more than doubled in the last couple of months (Figure 10). Although centralized platforms offer quicker and easier access to crypto trading, traders are considering complex but more secure options such as crypto wallets and keys because, like banks, centralized exchanges can do what they will with cryptocurrency while it’s in their possession. With self-custody, owners are in control.
Believe it or not, FTX was not the first crypto exchange to collapse. In 2014, Mt. Gox—the biggest crypto exchange at the time—lost half a billion dollars worth of Bitcoin due to a hack. How did Mt. Gox’s collapse affect sentiment for the crypto market then? The short answer is: It didn’t.
Figure 11 shows that while Mt. Gox’s sentiment polarity fluctuated, even reaching negative territories, the sentiment for the crypto market remained relatively stable and positive.
Figure 11: Mt. Gox and crypto sentiment comparison.
Is FTX’s collapse a warning for investors?
Our analysis is that investors should treat cryptocurrency exchanges like any investment opportunity. Do your due diligence and monitor your portfolio with tools like SESAMm’s TextReveal®.
As for the cryptocurrency market, data shows that sentiment for it remains level and positive. We speculate that cryptocurrency and centralized exchanges are here to stay. However, based on historical data and current news, we suspect conversations about crypto regulations to increase.
Reach out to SESAMm
For a deeper analysis of FTX’s collapse and access to all charts and supportive-article links, reach out to a representative today.
As scrutiny of corporate supply chains intensifies, investors are demanding more than policy statements and third-party audits. In this webinar, SESAMm and Inrate explore two powerful lenses for evaluating risks and sustainability impacts across global supplier networks: SESAMm’s real-time controversy detection and Inrate’s impact-driven sustainability data and ratings. Together, these approaches cover both public and private companies, go beyond self-disclosures, and enable assessments across a wide range of suppliers.
Watch this instant replay to dive into:
Emerging trends shaping how investors assess ESG risks and impacts across supply chains
The expanding role of AI in identifying hidden exposures and mapping sustainability outcomes
Proven strategies for combining controversy signals, ESG ratings, and emissions data to drive more informed decisions
Stay ahead with the latest in ESG and AI intelligence
Join our mailing list to receive new reports, event invites, and updates from SESAMm directly to your inbox.
.png)