Wildfires used to be a summer story. For most of the last decade, they arrived with the Northern Hemisphere dry season, dominated a few weeks of headlines, and receded once the rains came. That is no longer a safe assumption. Los Angeles burned in January 2025, a month that has historically been the quietest of the year for wildfire news anywhere in the world. Canada lost more forest in 2023 than in any year in its recorded history. Greece, Spain, and Portugal now post record-breaking fires in years that are not supposed to be their worst.

Given how much the pattern itself seems to be changing, we wanted to look past the headlines and into the data: how has coverage of wildfires actually moved over the past seven years, what does the aftermath of these fires look like once the smoke clears, and which countries, and companies, keep reappearing in the story. The analysis below sets out what the data shows, and, where it helps to understand it, what was actually happening on the ground at the time.

Executive summary

This analysis reviews global wildfire mentions between 2019 and 2026 across three lenses: quarterly mention volume, ESG sub-risk classification, and country-level geographic distribution, cross-referenced against documented public reporting. Three findings stand out: (1) wildfire coverage has shifted from a seasonal pattern to a sustained, year-round baseline since 2023; (2) coverage volume tracks proximity to population centers and identifiable liable parties more closely than it tracks the physical scale of the fire itself; and (3) the dominant subject matter in wildfire-related ESG coverage is the aftermath (casualties, contaminated water and air, insurance exposure, litigation) rather than the fire event in isolation.

1. Mention volume over time: a seasonal story becomes a year-round one

For most of the period, the data follows a predictable four-quarter cycle: Q1 is the annual low, Q2 shows a moderate rise, Q3 spikes with the Northern Hemisphere dry season, and Q4 falls back. That cycle breaks in two places, and both breaks mark a structural change rather than a one-off event.

• Q4 2023 does not return to baseline after the Q3 peak: coverage stays elevated into the final quarter for the first time in the dataset.
• Q1 2025, historically the lowest-volume quarter of the year, reaches roughly 270,000 mentions, more than several previous Q3 peaks.

The floor is the more telling number. In the quarters before 2023, non-peak volume rarely exceeded 80,000 mentions. From 2023 onward, even the quietest quarters do not fall below roughly 110,000–190,000. Wildfires have moved from a seasonal hazard to a year-round subject of coverage.

It's worth noting what does not explain this shift: acreage burned. 2020 through 2022, the years directly before this data climbs, include some of the largest fires by area in modern US and European history, yet register comparatively modest mention volume, partly because those years overlapped with the COVID-19 pandemic, which absorbed a large share of global news capacity.

The years that do dominate the chart, 2023 and 2025, are not necessarily the years with the most land burned; they are the years fire reached population centers and produced an identifiable party to blame. The Lahaina, Marshall, and Los Angeles fires are all comparatively small by area next to the 2020 US West Coast season or Canada's 2023 season, but generated substantially more coverage because of death toll, structures destroyed, and utility liability. Acreage, in short, is a weak predictor of coverage; proximity and blame are strong ones.

What was happening on the ground behind each peak

Each Q3 peak in the dataset lines up with a specific, documented cluster of events:

• Q3 2021: the Dixie Fire destroys the town of Greenville, California; PG&E is investigated for potential criminal liability; concurrent wildfires in Greece and evacuations in Turkey land in the same window.
• Q3 2022: fires threaten the Yosemite region and Sequoia groves in California; Spain and Portugal report wildfires during a European heat wave; a federal review attributes a New Mexico wildfire to a botched prescribed burn.
• Q3 2023: Canada's wildfire season becomes the largest on record, roughly 15–18 million hectares burned, eight firefighter deaths, and up to 232,000 evacuations, and sends smoke over the northeastern US, pushing New York City's air quality index to a peak of 465 on June 7. In the same window, the Maui fires trigger a negligence lawsuit against Hawaiian Electric, and in Greece, the Evros fire burns roughly 93,000 hectares, described by wildfire researchers as the largest single wildfire recorded in modern European history, days after the Rhodes evacuation of roughly 19,000 people, which Greek authorities called the country's largest-ever wildfire evacuation.
• Q3–Q4 2024: a wildfire cuts power to Labrador; another burns near Suncor's Firebag oil-sands site in Alberta; Jasper, Alberta is significantly damaged; Greek investigators attribute the country's worst fire of the year to a faulty power cable.
• Q1 2025 (the anomaly): a 14-fire outbreak tears through Los Angeles and San Diego County over January 7–31 on Santa Ana winds; the Palisades and Eaton fires alone destroy more than 18,000 structures and kill at least 31 people, with over 200,000 evacuated. Property-value loss is estimated at roughly $31 billion by CoStar, with total economic loss estimated between $250–275 billion by AccuWeather. Days later, the European Forest Fire Information System reports more than 100,000 hectares burned across the EU by the end of March, three months ahead of the typical season.

Across every year in the dataset, the same mechanism converts a fire into a sustained story: ignition (lightning, arson, or utility equipment failure) combines with drought and wind to produce the initial event, but litigation and identified liability sustain the coverage long after the fire is contained. PG&E, Southern California Edison, PacifiCorp, and Hawaiian Electric recur as named defendants across separate fires and separate years.

2. ESG sub-risk classification: ranked aftermath analysis

Wildfire-related controversies were classified into ESG sub-risk categories at the point of media mention. The ranking below runs from highest to lowest mention volume, with a documented, sourced example behind each category.

1. Community Health & Safety: by far the largest category. PG&E's Fire Victim Trust had paid out approximately $5.36 billion to survivors of the Butte, North Bay, and Camp fires as of late 2023, with payouts raised to 70% of approved claims by August 2025 against a $13.5 billion settlement fund; PacifiCorp has now paid or been ordered to pay more than $2 billion across Oregon and California wildfire litigation, including a $575 million federal settlement, a $305 million jury verdict, and a $125 million settlement with Oregon wineries; Hawaiian Electric remains in an active negligence case over the Maui fires.
2. Climate Change: wildfires are framed as both symptom and accelerant. Canada's 2023 season burned at roughly seven times the historical average; researchers found climate change had tripled the underlying fire risk in the country's boreal forest, and the season released an estimated 1.5 billion metric tons of CO2, comparable to a decade of Canada's typical wildfire emissions.
3. Biodiversity & Ecosystems: tied mainly to two events: Australia's Black Summer, where a WWF-commissioned study estimated three billion animals killed, injured, or displaced, including more than 60,000 koalas; and the Amazon, where 2024 fires burned an estimated 15.6–22 million hectares, the worst season on record, with Brazil alone logging 237,000 individual fires.
4. Customer Relations: reflects the California property-insurance crisis: State Farm nonrenewed roughly 72,000 California policies in the two years before the January 2025 fires, then faced a state investigation into claims handling, including denial of hygienic smoke-damage testing, after the fires it did cover. A $1 billion FAIR Plan assessment was subsequently levied on insurers operating in California.
5. Right to Property: tied to the scale of destroyed real estate, an estimated $31 billion in property value destroyed in the January 2025 Los Angeles fires, and to litigation over responsibility for that loss, including Los Angeles County's lawsuit against Southern California Edison and Edison's countersuit against the county.
6. Occupational Health & Safety: firefighter casualties and injury: the NFPA recorded 83 US firefighter fatalities in 2025, up from 69 in 2024; Canada's 2023 season killed eight firefighters; South Korea's 2025 wildfire outbreak killed three firefighters among its 32 total fatalities.
7. Marketing & Communication: covers corporate communications during active disasters, including relief pledges, the Recording Academy and MusiCares pledged $1 million to Los Angeles wildfire relief in January 2025, and utility crisis messaging, which came under renewed scrutiny after Edison International executive pay continued to rise during the period the company faced Eaton Fire liability claims.
8. Water Pollution: municipal water contamination after urban-interface fires. Following the January 2025 Los Angeles fires, benzene and other volatile organic compounds were detected in the drinking water of the Palisades, Altadena, and surrounding service areas; a follow-up point-of-use study found benzene in 17% of sampled homes. The same pattern was documented after the 2017 Tubbs Fire (Santa Rosa) and 2018 Camp Fire (Paradise), both also PG&E-linked.
9. Working Conditions: wildland and municipal firefighting workforce strain during extended, overlapping fire seasons across multiple continents.
10. Atmospheric Pollution: principally the June 2023 Canadian smoke event: New York City's air quality index peaked at 465, with a 24-hour PM2.5 average nearly three times the US regulatory standard, and follow-on research linked the event to a 44–82% increase in asthma-related emergency-department visits in the city.
11. Rights of Indigenous Communities: most documented in Canada, where more than 40% of national wildfire evacuations historically involve Indigenous communities, including the 2023 evacuation of the majority-Indigenous Northwest Territories capital, Yellowknife; and in the Amazon basin, where Indigenous-managed territories have been found to sequester carbon at rates far exceeding non-Indigenous-managed land.
12. Accounting & Securities Fraud: the Edison International shareholder class action filed after the Eaton Fire, alleging the company misrepresented the readiness of its power-shutoff program; Edison's share price fell approximately 34% following the fire, and the suit names CEO Pedro Pizarro and CFO Maria Rigatti as defendants.

The remaining categories (Product Safety, Fundamental Human Rights, Energy & Natural Resources Management, Board of Directors & Senior Management, and Data Privacy & Cyber Security) account for smaller shares of classified documents and were not tied to a comparably documented recurring event pattern in this dataset.

3. Geographic distribution of coverage

The United States accounts for the largest share of country-level mentions throughout the period, without a single dominant spike: volume rises through 2023–2025, peaks around 2025, then falls sharply into 2026. That shape fits a continuing sequence of named utility liability cases (PG&E, Southern California Edison, PacifiCorp) more than it fits a single event.

Outside the US, coverage is more episodic, clustering around identifiable national events rather than building a sustained baseline:

• Australia peaks sharply around 2019–2020, matching Black Summer (24 million hectares burned, 33 deaths, an estimated three billion animals affected), then recedes.
• Canada rises from 2022 and peaks around 2025, matching the record 2023 season (roughly 15–18 million hectares, eight firefighter deaths, up to 232,000 evacuated) and the continuation of large fires in 2024, including Jasper.
• Greece shows a sustained late-period rise, matching the 2023 Rhodes evacuation and the Evros fire, followed by continued fire activity in 2024, including the faulty-power-cable fire investigators called the country's worst of the year.
• Spain shows its highest point at the end of the series, consistent with the unusually early 2025 season (100,000+ hectares burned across the EU by end of March) and recurring summer wildfire and heat-wave coverage in 2022.
• France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom register comparatively low, stable volumes throughout, with modest increases around 2024–2025 in line with the broader post-2023 elevated baseline rather than country-specific events.

Read together, US coverage behaves like an ongoing institutional and legal narrative anchored by utility litigation, while rest-of-world coverage behaves like a series of discrete, event-driven spikes tied to specific fire seasons.

Conclusion

Across mention volume, ESG classification, and geography, the evidence points to a consistent mechanism. Coverage volume is driven primarily by three factors: proximity of the fire to population centers, the presence of an identifiable liable party, typically a utility, and how much a competing global news cycle is absorbing attention capacity at the same time. The physical scale of a fire is, on its own, a comparatively weak predictor of how much coverage it receives. On that basis, the next spike in wildfire coverage is more likely to come from an urban-interface fire with a clear liability story than from the largest fire by area.

Chinese companies face elevated ESG risk exposure as scale, rapid growth, and cross-border operations intersect with tighter regulations and geopolitical pressures. Social risks cluster around worker rights and customer harm: “996” overwork and layoffs in tech, safety failures in new technologies and EVs, and severe labor allegations in global supply chains.

Governance risks are the dominant theme, reflected across multiple jurisdictions and industry sectors: recurring regulatory enforcement and compliance failures, litigation-heavy operating models, weak internal controls, and heightened disclosure, audit, and listing pressure in overseas markets. A major amplifier is data-security and national-security risk, with allegations of illegal data collection or leaks and intensifying foreign scrutiny over potential military ties and state influence.

Environmental risks cluster around manufacturing pollution and emissions compliance, alongside chemical-product safety and carbon-intensive logistics footprints in fast fashion and e-commerce.

What are the most pressing ESG challenges currently facing Chinese companies? Read on to find out.

Alibaba: Navigating Controversies and Governance Challenges

Alibaba’s ESG risk profile remains elevated, reflected in its controversy exposure score (CES) of 99/100. Social risks include persistent criticism of “996” work practices, workplace conduct controversies, layoffs, and reputational fallout from marketplace safety incidents, and rising customer complaints. Governance risks, meanwhile, are multi-jurisdictional, spanning U.S. audit scrutiny and past NYSE delisting threats, alleged filing irregularities in India, EU DSA pressure on AliExpress, and ongoing counterfeit and patent litigation.

In parallel, integrity and geopolitical risks heighten scrutiny, notably through a police investigation into alleged supply-chain corruption at Ele.me, U.S. probes related to data privacy and alleged military links, and a $433.5 million investor lawsuit recovery. Environmental exposure remains primarily supply-chain and footprint-driven, including a 2025 pesticide finding and emissions-related criticism in Belgium. Based on SESAMm’s UNGC screening, we found that several of Alibaba’s controversies show potential alignment concerns with UN Global Compact principles, reinforcing the need for continuous monitoring.

Shein: Heavy ESG Scrutiny Amid Legal and Environmental Challenges

Similarly, Shein faces sustained ESG pressures across governance, environmental, and social dimensions, reflected in its high CES of 89/100, indicating material and ongoing exposure. Social risks include allegations of exploitative factory conditions, disclosed child-labor cases, and reputational backlash linked to cultural appropriation and marketing practices, alongside integrity concerns such as reported coordinated bot activity to defend the brand online.

Governance risks are multi-jurisdictional and litigation-heavy, spanning a $100 million U.S. lawsuit, repeated IP disputes, and a RICO suit alleging systematic design theft, as well as data and marketing compliance failures that resulted in a $1.9 million fine and major enforcement actions in Europe, including France’s $176 million cookie fine. Meanwhile, environmental exposure remains structurally tied to Shein’s fast-fashion model, with recurring hazardous chemical findings breaching EU limits, scrutiny over air-freight emissions, and greenwashing enforcement, including a €1 million fine in Italy.

BYD: Risks and Controversies Demand Ongoing Monitoring

BYD’s ESG profile reflects sustained controversy exposure, with a CES score of 89/100, indicating material and ongoing risk. Social risks include product-safety concerns, notably the Atto 3 receiving the lowest-ever assisted-driving safety score and a recall of more than 16,000 EVs; more critically, Brazilian authorities shut down a factory site over alleged “slavery-like” labor conditions and battery mineral sourcing linked to human-rights abuses, culminating in a $50 million lawsuit.

Governance risks are cross-border and multifaceted, spanning tax-fraud allegations, IP disputes such as BMW’s “M6” trademark case, EU scrutiny over potential unfair Chinese subsidies at BYD’s Hungary plant, concerns in South Korea regarding possible in-vehicle data leakage, a securities-fraud investigation notice, and U.S. designation activity linking BYD to Chinese military-affiliated entities. Meanwhile, environmental exposure centers on factory pollution at Changsha tied to reported health impacts and heightened emissions-compliance scrutiny following accusations of emissions cheating.

From a UNGC perspective, a number of BYD’s controversies show potential alignment concerns with UN Global Compact principles, particularly around labor rights and governance, and reinforcing the importance of ongoing monitoring.

 Conclusion

Taken together, Alibaba, Shein, and BYD illustrate how scale, speed, and global expansion can amplify ESG exposure when governance, labor oversight, and compliance controls lag behind operational growth. High CES scores across all three companies underscore that these risks are not isolated incidents but structural and recurring in nature.

Watch the replay of our webinar, "CSDDD Demystified: A Practical Guide for Corporate Sustainability," to gain the actionable insights your business needs to navigate the complexities of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD).

In this session, Kevin Ozadanir, Head of Corporate Sales at SESAMm, and Greta Koch, Technical Negotiator for the European People’s Party on the CSDDD, break down the directive's objectives and provide practical guidance for companies tackling compliance challenges. This is your opportunity to:

• Understand the CSDDD's objectives and its role in strengthening the EU's sustainability agenda.
  
• Learn how the directive compares to other regulations, such as the German Supply Chain Act, and what sets it apart.
• Prepare for compliance by exploring strategies to integrate sustainable systems and address diverse regulatory expectations across the EU.
• Get a blueprint for effective risk analysis and supply chain management tailored to companies operating across multiple jurisdictions.
• Stay ahead of political developments, including the potential repeal of Germany's Supply Chain Act and what it means for global sustainability.

The webinar wraps up with a deep dive into integrating CSDDD with other frameworks, such as the EU Taxonomy and CSRD, and provides a clear roadmap for aligning your operations with evolving corporate sustainability standards.

Don't miss this chance to equip your team with the knowledge to tackle regulatory challenges with confidence. Fill out the form to access the webinar replay now!