Corporate Accountability in 2024: A Deep Dive into the Year's Top ESG Controversies
January 30, 2025
•
5 mins read
As 2025 kicks off, we stopped to take a look at the significant environmental, social, and governance (ESG) controversies of 2024, as we do every year. In this article, we dive into the three public companies with the most controversies for each pillar: environmental, social, and governance, analyzing the companies and the wider impact of the controversies themselves. Join us as we analyze these key moments that have not only influenced public opinion but also shaped the future of responsible business practices.
ESG Risks: Focus 2024
Starting with environmental risks, biodiversity and ecosystems, climate change, waste management, and atmospheric pollution emerged as the most scrutinized sub-risks in 2024. These issues were primarily tied to greenwashing, such as the Mercer Super case and energy companies' expansions at the expense of climate change.
Meanwhile, for social controversies, working conditions and fundamental human rights took center stage. Notably, some companies were linked to forced labor, while coffee supply chains were linked to child labor. Boycotts over the war on Gaza have also been a major highlight of 2024.
Environmental Controversies: Top 3 Public Companies
Shell
In 2024, Shell faced a host of environmental controversies, particularly through its Nigerian subsidiary, Nigeria Delta, which was implicated in serious water pollution due to oil spills. The company dealt with several other notable controversies, including a €15 million compensation related to the spills, a New York City lawsuit over climate change, and a landmark emissions ruling from a Dutch court. Additionally, the company faced condemnation from U.S. lawmakers for alleged greenwashing practices, a carbon credit scandal, and a water contamination lawsuit resolved with a $230 million settlement.
ExxonMobil
2024 was a challenging year for ExxonMobil. First, its Hammerhead project was hit by an FDA-required Environmental Impact Assessment to evaluate the potential ecological risks. Then, conflicts with Venezuela arose over environmental concerns, followed by several U.S. lawsuits. California, Kansas, and Puerto Rico all sued the company for issues ranging from global plastic pollution and greenwashing to trade law violations. Additionally, ExxonMobil was targeted in a climate lawsuit and faced ongoing fallout from the 1989 oil spill. Protests from groups like CalPERS and student activists highlighted dissatisfaction with ExxonMobil’s environmental practices, emphasizing the company's broad regulatory and public relations challenges.
TotalEnergies
Coming in at number three, TotalEnergies dealt with several environmental controversies, notbably protests related to its East African crude oil pipeline project in Tanzania and Uganda. The company has also been accused of greenwashing and misleading sustainability claims while struggling with oil leaks at its Donges refinery and Egina field. On top of these environmental controversies, TotalEngeries faced key governance and social controversies, including a $48 million fine by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for attempting to manipulate the European gasoline market in March 2018. There are also ongoing investigations into an attack in Mozambique.
Social Controversies: Top 3 Public Companies
Boeing
In 2024, Boeing faced significant challenges due to safety concerns and production controversies, which have fueled employee unrest and public skepticism. Recent incidents, including a missing door plug attachment on a Boeing 737 Max and investigations into quality control lapses at Boeing and its supplier Spirit AeroSystems, have eroded trust among small businesses reliant on the manufacturer. Whistleblower testimonies and increasing scrutiny from Congress and the FAA highlight systemic safety failures. These developments suggest a difficult path ahead for Boeing as it works to regain credibility amid ongoing struggles.
Pfizer
In 2024, Pfizer faced scrutiny after EU documents revealed over 4.9 million adverse events and 3,280 deaths linked to its COVID-19 vaccine, especially among women and individuals aged 31-50. Critics allege Pfizer continued distribution despite knowing the risks, questioning the EMA's approval. Additionally, DNA contaminants, including carcinogenic SV40 sequences, have been reported in the vaccines. A whistleblower disclosed that Pfizer employees were offered a "separate" COVID vaccine, raising concerns about access inequality. Kansas has filed a lawsuit accusing Pfizer of misleading the public about vaccine safety; meanwhile, the company faces fines in the UK for excessive pricing of an anti-epileptic drug.
Meta
In 2024, Meta faced intense scrutiny and legal challenges due to multiple controversies, including a significant data breach, allegations of failing to protect children, and privacy concerns. The company settled a $1.4 billion lawsuit related to facial recognition practices and was fined $220 million by Nigeria for violating data laws. Additional lawsuits from school districts and the Consumer Protection Association highlighted issues related to social media addiction and mental health impacts on teenagers.
Governance Controversies: Top 3 Public Companies
Alphabet
2024 was a legally challenging year for Alphabet, facing numerous antitrust issues globally. For instance, Allegro sued Alphabet for $568 million over anti-competitive practices, and the U.S. Justice Department accused Google of monopolies in the search engine and Android app markets. It has also faced an antitrust ruling, which it plans to appeal. In Europe, Google was scrutinized under the Digital Markets Act and fined 71 million euros in Turkey for anti-competitive behavior. Additionally, France imposed a $271 million fine on Google for using news content without publisher consent, and India began investigating Google's gaming app policies. These incidents highlight Alphabet’s ongoing regulatory battles across multiple continents.
In conclusion, the controversies surrounding environmental, social, and governance issues in 2024 have underscored the urgent need for accountability and transparency within corporations. As these companies grapple with significant backlash and legal challenges, it is clear that stakeholder expectations are evolving. The demand for responsible practices is louder than ever, and the consequences of neglecting these issues can be severe, impacting not just public perception but also financial stability and sustainability.
SESAMm’s AI Technology Reveals ESG Insights
Discover unparalleled insights into ESG controversies, risks, and opportunities across industries. Learn more about how SESAMm can help you analyze millions of private and public companies using AI-powered text analysis tools.
Paris, France – 24 février 2026 – SESAMm, leader mondial des données de controverses ESG et réputationnelles, annonce le renouvellement de son partenariat avec le Crédit Mutuel Arkéa, initié en janvier 2023, pour le renforcement de l’évaluation et du suivi des risques ESG au sein de ses activités d’achats et d’investissement.
Depuis le début de cette collaboration, Crédit Mutuel Arkéa s’appuie sur la plateforme SESAMm pour analyser les risques environnementaux, sociaux et de gouvernance liés à ses fournisseurs, partenaires et participations. Grâce à des données de controverses ESG fondées sur l’intelligence artificielle, il est possible d’identifier notamment les manquements réglementaires, incidents environnementaux, risques sociaux, atteintes aux droits humains, cas de corruption et autres risques réputationnels.
Dans le cadre de ce partenariat renouvelé, SESAMm poursuit cet accompagnement, à la fois lors des appels d’offres et dans le suivi continu des tiers, ainsi que pour l’analyse des dossiers d’investissement et la surveillance quotidienne du portefeuille, complétées par des synthèses hebdomadaires des controverses ESG.
Ce renouvellement de confiance confirme la valeur ajoutée des analyses de SESAMm pour renforcer la cohérence, la réactivité et la robustesse des processus de due diligence et de gestion des risques ESG du Crédit Mutuel Arkéa.
Financial and ESG insights begin with big data coupled with data science.
At SESAMm, our artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) platform analyzes text in billions of web-based articles and messages. It generates investment insights and ESG analysis used in systematic trading, fundamental research, risk management, and sustainability analysis.
This technology enables a more quantitative approach to leveraging the value of web data that is less prone to human bias. It addresses a growing need in public and private investment sectors for robust, timely, and granular sentiment and environment, social, and governance (ESG) data. This article will outline how the data is derived and illustrate its effectiveness and predictive value.
Content coverage and ESG data collection
The genesis of SESAMm’s process is the high-quality content that comprises its data lake, the source from which it draws its insights. SESAMm scans over four million data sources rigorously selected and curated to maximize coverage of both public and private companies. Three guiding criteria—quality, quantity, and frequency—ensure a consistently high input value.
Every day the system adds millions of articles to the 16 billion already in the data lake, going back to 2008. The coverage is global, with 40% of the sources in English (the U.S. and international) and 60% in multiple languages. The data lake, expanding every month, comprises over 4 million sources, including professional news sites, blogs, social media, and discussion forums.
The following tables illustrate SESAMm’s data lake distribution (Q1 2022):
Respect for personal privacy figures highly in the data gathering process. We don’t capture personal data, like personally identifiable information (PII), and respect all website terms of service and global data handling and privacy laws. SESAMm’s data also doesn’t contain any material non-public information (MNPI).
Deriving financial signals and ESG performance indicators
SESAMm’s new TextReveal® Streams platform applies NLP and AI expertise to process the premium quality content gathered in its data lake. This complex process involves named entity recognition (NER) and disambiguation (NED)—the process of identifying entities and distinguishing like-named entities using contextual analysis—and mapping the complex interrelationships between tens of thousands of public and private entities, connecting companies, products, and brands by supply chain, location, or competitive relationship.
Process representation for NER and NED
Using SESAMm’s TextReveal Streams, this wealth of information is filtered to focus on four crucial contexts for systematic data processing, risk management, and alpha discovery:
Sentiment covering major global indices: world equities (and Small Caps, Emerging), U.S. 3000, Europe 600, KOSPI 50, Japan 500, Japan 225
Sentiment covering all assets and derivatives traded on the Euronext exchange
Private company sentiment on more than 25,000 private companies
ESG risks covering 90 major environmental, social, and governance risk categories for the entire company universe, which includes more than 10,000 public and more than 25,000 private companies with worldwide coverage
TextReveal Streams data sets and assessments are used by financial institutions, rating agencies, and the financial services sector, such as hedge funds (quantitative and fundamental) and asset managers, to optimize trade timing and identify new sustainable investment opportunities. Private equity deal and credit teams also use the data for deal sourcing and due diligence. Private equity ESG teams use it to manage initiatives like portfolio company environmental, social, and governance risk and reporting.
Methodology and technology for processing unstructured data
NLP workflow, from data extraction to granular insight aggregation
Data is continually extracted from an expanding universe of over four million sources daily. As it enters the system, it is time-stamped, tagged, indexed, and stored in our data lake to update a point-in-time history extending from 2008 to the present. The source material is then transformed from raw, unstructured text data into conformed, interconnected, machine-readable data with a precise topic.
NLP workflow for TextReveal Streams
Mapping relationships between entities with the Knowledge Graph
At the heart of the text analytics process is SESAMm’s proprietary Knowledge Graph, a vast map connecting and integrating over 70 million related entities and their keywords. It’s essentially a cross-referenced dictionary of keywords, relating each organization to its brands, products, associated executives, names, nicknames, and their exchange identifiers in the case of public companies.
Entities within the Knowledge Graph are updated weekly and tagged to ensure changes are correctly tracked. The CEO of a company today, for example, may not be the CEO tomorrow, and brands may be bought and sold, changing the parent company with each sale. Weekly updates within the Knowledge Graph ensure the system is aware of these changes.
Named entity disambiguation (named entity recognition plus entity linking) is one of the NLP techniques used to identify named entities in text sources using the entities mapped within the Knowledge Graph universe.
At SESAMm, NED identifies named entities based on their context and usage. Text referencing “Elon,” for example, could refer indirectly to Tesla through its CEO or to a university in North Carolina. Only the context allows us to differentiate, and NED considers that context when classifying entities. This method is superior to simple pattern matching, limiting the number of possible matches, requiring frequent manual adjustments, and cannot distinguish homophones.
SESAMm uses three other NLP tools to identify entities and create actionable insights. These are lemmatization, embeddings, and similarity. Each is explained in more detail below.
Analyzing the morphology of words with lemmatization
News articles, blog posts, and social media discussions reference organizations and associated entities in various forms and functions. Lemmatization seeks to standardize these references so the system knows they mean the same thing.
For example, “Tesla,” “his firm,” “the company,” and “it” are all noun phrases that can appear in a single article and refer to a single entity. Even where the reference is apparent, it can take different forms. For example, “Tesla” and “Teslas” both refer to the same entity but have slightly different meanings (semantics) and shapes (morphology).
The lemmatization process standardizes reference shape (morphology) to facilitate identification and aggregation. Lemmatization is a more sophisticated process than stemming, which truncates words to their stem and sometimes deletes information.
Encoding context and meaning with word embedding
In NLP, embedding is a numerical representation of a word that enables its manifold contextual meanings to be calculated relationally. Embeddings are typically real-valued vectors with hundreds of dimensions that encode the contexts in which words appear and, thus, also encode their meanings. Because they are vectors in a predefined vector space, they can be compared, scaled, added, and subtracted. An example of how this works is that the vector representations of king and queen bear the same relation to each other as the representations of man and woman once you subtract the vector that represents royal.
Vectorized representation of embeddings
Using embedding is key to analyzing how words change meaning depending on context and understanding the subtle differences between words that refer to the same concept: synonyms. For example, the words business, company, enterprise, and firm can all refer to the same thing if the context is “organizations.” But they represent different things and even different parts of speech if the context changes.
In the phrase, “[Tesla] will be by far the largest firm by market value ever to join the S&P,” for example, one could replace the word firm with company or enterprise without affecting the meaning significantly. Contrast that with “a firm handshake,” where a similar substitution would render the phrase meaningless.
Also, words referring to the same concept can emphasize slightly different aspects of the concept or imply specific qualities. For example, an enterprise might be assumed to be larger or to have more components than a firm. Embeddings enable machines to make these subtle distinctions.
One advantage of using embedding is that it’s practical because it’s empirically testable. In other words, we can look at actual usage to determine what a word means.
Another advantage is that embeddings are computationally tractable. This understanding of a word’s definition allows us to transform words into computation objects to programmatically examine the contexts in which they appear and, thus, derive their meaning.
As lemmatization is an improvement on stemming, embeddings improve techniques such as one-hot encoding, which is close to the common conception of a definition as a single entry in a dictionary.
SESAMm uses the global vectors for word representation (GloVe) algorithm to generate embeddings. It’s an unsupervised learning algorithm that begins by examining how frequently each word in a text corpus co-occurs with other words in the same corpus. The result is an embedding that encapsulates the word and its context together, allowing SESAMm to identify specific words in a list and different forms of the listed words and unlisted synonyms.
GloVe is an extension of recent approaches to vector representation, combining the global statistics of matrix factorization techniques like latent semantic analysis (LSA) with the local context-based learning of word2vec. The result is an unsupervised algorithm that performs well at capturing meaning and demonstrating it on tasks like calculating analogies and identifying synonyms.
BERT is another algorithm used by SESAMm to generate embeddings. BERT produces word representations that are dynamically informed by the words around them. Google developed the technique, and it’s what’s known as a transformer-based machine learning technique, which means it doesn’t process an input sequence token by token but instead takes the entire sequence as input in one go. This technique is a significant improvement over sequential recurrent neural network (RNN) based models because it can be accelerated by graphics processing units (GPUs).
SESAMm uses BERT for multilingual NLP of its extensive foreign language text because it has been retained using an extensive library of unlabeled data extracted from Wikipedia in over 102 languages. BERT model was trained to predict words from context and next sentence prediction where it was trained to predict if a chosen following sentence was probable or not given the first sentence. As a result of this training process, BERT learned contextual embeddings for words. Due to this comprehensive pre-training, BERT can be finetuned with fewer resources on smaller datasets to optimize its performance on specific tasks.
Linking words, sentences, and topics with cosine similarity
Cosine similarity with centered means it’s identical to the correlation coefficient, which highlights another element of the computational tractability of the embeddings approach. It makes it easy to compare words and contexts for similarity.
Converting words to vector representations means we can quickly and easily compare word similarity by comparing the angle between two vectors. This angle is a function of the projection of one vector onto another. It can identify similar, opposite, or wholly unrelated vectors, which allows us to compute the similarity of the underlying word that the vector represents.
Two vectors aligned in the same orientation will have a similarity measurement of 1, while two orthogonal vectors have a similarity of 0. If two vectors are diametrically opposed, the similarity measurement is -1. In practice, negative similarities are rare, so we clip negative values to 0.
Vectorized representation of cosine similarities
Cosine similarity measures whether two words, sentences, or corpora are close to one another in vector space or “about” the same thing in semantic space. To answer the question, “Is this sentence referencing company X?” we embed the sentence using the process described above and compute the cosine similarity between the sentence and the embedded company profile. Analogously, we compute similarities between sentences and the ESG topics SESAMm monitors by taking the maximum similarity between a sentence and each embedded keyword associated with an ESG topic.
These similarities allow us to identify whether a sentence references fraud, tax avoidance, pollution, or any other ESG risk topic among the more than 90 that SESAMm tracks across the web.
Similarities within ESG topics combine with word counts to resolve the recall and precision problem. Word counts are precise because if a word is identified within a context, then that context, by construction, references the topic.
The virtue of using these NLP techniques is that even if a given keyword list does not include every possible combination of words that a person might use to discuss a topic, relevant entities missed by the word-count process will be identified through vector similarity.
This is the power of SESAMm’s NLP expertise. We can scan many lifetimes’ worth of data in seconds to find the concepts you explicitly ask for and the concepts relevant to your search but that you did not think of yourself.
Sentiment analysis with deep learning and neural networks
Once we’ve identified the concepts and contexts of interest in all the forms they appear, we analyze the context to determine the speakers’ attitudes.
We use sentiment classification models to score a sentence with three possible outcomes: negative, neutral, or positive. The current classification models are based on deep learning AI technologies. Specifically, we stack convolutional neural networks with word embeddings and bayesian optimized hyperparameters—parameters not learned during training. This architecture improves the accuracy and enables fast shipping of production-ready models for a given language. We also produce state-of-the-art frameworks with architecture variations enabling multilingual capabilities, such as transformers and universal sentence encoders.
Condensing information and extracting insights with daily aggregation
Similarities, embedded word counts, and sentiment are state-of-the-art tools for processing unstructured text data. The same tools are effective cross-linguistically.
Once the information has been extracted from millions of data points, it’s aggregated and condensed into actionable insights.
All entities are referenced directly or indirectly within an article. Then, sentence-level references are aggregated to obtain an article-level perspective, and finally, all relevant articles are aggregated to gain an entity-level view of that day.
In this way, reams of data are compressed into several metrics to provide a daily aggregate view for each entity, highlighting trends at a sentence, article, and entity-level comparable over a multi-year history.
ESG analysis use cases
SESAMm’s TextReveal Streams is used in various investment domains, from asset selection to alpha generation and risk management. Systematic hedge funds track retail interest in real time to identify investment opportunities and protect their existing positions. In the Private Equity industry, equity and credit-deal teams use the data in various ways, from monitoring consumer perspectives via forums and customer reviews for evaluating deal prospects to estimating due diligence risks, all to help make investment decisions. Dedicated teams use our data for monitoring portfolio companies for ESG red flags that conventional ESG reporting might miss.
Below are two examples of how aggregated TextReveal Streams data can be used to help identify investment risk and opportunity.
LFIS CapitalL: ESG signals for equity trading
ESG controversies can significantly impact asset prices in the short term, and it’s now estimated that intangible assets, including a company’s ESG rating, account for 90% of its market value.
Working in partnership with LFIS Capital (LFIS), a quantitative asset manager and structured investment solutions provider, SESAMm developed machine learning and NLP algorithms that could analyze ESG keywords in articles, blogs, and social media, to generate a daily ESG score specific to each stock, which is part of the TextReveal Streams’ platform’s core functionality.
The results were promising when these scores were incorporated into a simulated strategy for trading stocks in the Stoxx600 ESG-X index.
A simulated long-only strategy running between 2015 and 2020, using the signals, delivered a 7.9% annualized return, 2.9% higher than the benchmark for similar annualized volatility (17.3% vs. 17.1%). The information ratio of the strategy was greater than 1, with a tracking error of 2.8%. Results for the previous three years were compelling, reflecting the growing interest and news flow around ESG themes.
Researchers also backtested a hypothetical long-short strategy for all stocks in the Stoxx600 ESG-X index with a market cap of over $7.5bn. This investment strategy delivered a Sharpe ratio of approximately 1 with annualized returns and volatility of 6.1% and 5.9%, respectively, between 2015 and 2020. Like the long-only strategy, returns were particularly robust over the three years up to 2020: +6.0% in 2018, +7.3% in 2019, and +11.3% in 2020.
Finally, a simulated “130/30” ESG strategy that combined 100% of the long-only ESG strategy and 30% of the long-short ESG strategy delivered a 10.8% annualized return, 5.8% higher than that of the Stoxx600 ESG-X index. Annualized volatility was similar at 16.9% vs. 17.1%. The strategy experienced a tracking error of 3.8% and an information ratio of over 1.5, with a consistent outperformance each year.
Disclaimer: Past performance is not an indicator of future results. Theoretical calculations are provided for illustrative purposes only. The investment theme illustrations presented herein do not represent transactions currently implemented in any fund or product managed by LFIS.
Wirecard: ESG sentiment and volume as predictive indicators
The Wirecard scandal broke on June 21, 2020, when newswires carried the story that the major German payment processor had filed for bankruptcy after admitting that €1.9 billion ($2.3 billion) of purported escrow deposits did not exist.
Could SESAMm’s TextReveal Streams platform have provided investors with an early warning that the scandal was about to break?
The following chart derived from the platform shows how key ESG metrics, including ESG scores (volumes) and ESG scores (sentiment), reacted to the news.
An analysis of the charts pinpoints a shallow rise in the ESG scores (volumes) time series in the early part of June before the eruption on June 21.
The ESG scores (sentiment) metric also shows a steady increase in negative sentiment for governance, the most relevant of the three ESG factors regarding the scandal.
How key ESG metrics, including ESG scores (volumes) and ESG scores (sentiment), reacted to the Wirecard scandal news.
Additionally, before the crash, governance was the most negative of the three ESG factors most of the time. This was especially the case from late March to early April, and then before the scandal in early June, negative governance sentiment diverged higher from the other two.
The rate-of-change of negative governance sentiment as it rose and peaked in early June before the scandal broke was also extremely high, perhaps providing the basis for an early warning signal.
Portfolio managers who had been keeping an eye on the reputational slide in Governance for Wirecard may have decided the company was at high risk of a negative controversy emerging, giving them cause to drop the stock before the event.
In this way, it can be seen how while not providing a hard and fast early warning signal, SESAMm’s ESG scores can, nevertheless, be used as the basis for developing a data-driven, rules-based portfolio management approach that can help investors avoid high-risk candidates like Wirecard.
SESAMm takes on ESG data challenges
SESAMm’s NLP and AI tools analyze over four million data sources daily to identify thousands of public and private companies and their related products, brands, identifiers, and nicknames, turning reams of unstructured text into structured and actionable data.
SESAMm’s TextReveal Streams platform can be used in many quantitative, quantamental, and ESG investment use cases. TextReveal is a solution that allows you to fully leverage NLP-driven insights and receive high-quality results through data streams, modular API and dashboard visualization, and signals and alerts.
Learn how SESAMm can support you in your investment decision-making and request a demo today.
To request a demo or for access to the full SESAMm Wirecard or LFIS reports, contact us here:
Inrate’s Controversies assessment and ESG Ratings will now be enhanced by SESAMm’s extensive AI-driven controversy data, deepening visibility into real-time corporate risks.
Zurich & Paris — 5th May 2025 — Inrate, the leading ESG data and ratings specialist that pioneered impact ratings built on science-based sustainability analysis, and SESAMm, a global leader in AI-powered ESG and reputational risk data, have announced a new partnership. This collaboration will enrich Inrate’s ESG Ratings with SESAMm’s real-time controversy insights, which cover millions of companies across over 4 million global sources.
Through this partnership, Inrate will integrate SESAMm’s large-scale controversy event data into its controversies analysis, ESG assessments, and ratings. This enhances Inrate’s insights into ESG controversies and strengthens its rigorous approach to evaluating corporate sustainability performance. All of Inrate’s research and ratings extend beyond reported data, incorporating the sustainability impact of business activities and ESG controversies for a holistic picture of a company’s sustainability performance.
“Our ESG Ratings are built on a robust foundation—assessing companies based on the impact of their activities, not just on what they choose to disclose,” said Saurabh Srivastava, Head of Sustainability Data and Ratings at Inrate. “By integrating SESAMm’s extensive data set, we further enhance our ability to uncover relevant ESG events quickly and with greater global coverage, capturing a more complete and objective view.”
“Inrate’s ESG Ratings offer a powerful lens on real ESG impact. By adding SESAMm’s expansive, multilingual controversy data, users gain faster and broader visibility into the ESG events that matter,” said Sylvain Forté, CEO & Co-founder of SESAMm. “We’re proud to partner with a company that shares our values of providing unbiased, transparent data.”
About Inrate
Inrate, a Sustainability Data & ESG Ratings firm, helps financial institutions view sustainable finance through an impact lens. We offer high-quality, granular analyses across a broad range of datasets used by investment teams from due diligence, portfolio analysis, and reporting, to exit.
About SESAMm
SESAMm is a global leader in ESG controversy data, using advanced Generative AI. We automate monitoring and due diligence on public and private assets, providing coverage of more than 5 million companies. We work with Carlyle, Warburg, Natixis, RBI, Fitch, Oddo, and many more. SESAMm has raised $50M from renowned investors and operates across four continents. Learn more at www.sesamm.com.
SESAMm’s AI Technology Reveals ESG Insights
Discover unparalleled insights into ESG controversies, risks, and opportunities across industries. Learn more about how SESAMm can help you analyze millions of private and public companies using AI-powered text analysis tools.
Stay ahead with the latest in ESG and AI intelligence
Join our mailing list to receive new reports, event invites, and updates from SESAMm directly to your inbox.