Wednesday, September 14, 2022, a16z (Andreessen Horowitz), a large, well-known VC firm, funded Flow, a new startup led by a seemingly scandalous entrepreneur, Adam Neumann, the founder infamously known to have been ousted as WeWork CEO.

Why did a16z invest in Flow and, by proxy, Adam Neumann?

In his blog post about “Investing in Flow,” Andreessen acknowledges the U.S. housing crisis in the first sentence, and here’s what he has to say about Neumann: “Adam is a visionary leader who revolutionized the second largest asset class in the world—commercial real estate—by bringing community and brand to an industry in which neither existed before.” Andreessen continues, “[I]t’s often underappreciated that only one person has fundamentally redesigned the office experience and led a paradigm-changing global company in the process.”

So that gives us a clue as to what Andreessen thinks. But what does the public web have to say, and what is its overall sentiment?

In this edition of Alternative Data Trends, we dig into public web data before, during, and after a16z announced that it would fund Flow. Does the public web agree with Andreesen’s view? If not, how does it differ? And how can this information inform an investor and other VC firms?

Let’s find out.

a16z web mention volume and polarity (Nov. 2015 to Jun. 2022)

Mention volumes spike in mid-June 2021

TextReveal^® uncovered 181,620 articles and messages from SESAMm’s data lake about Andreessen Horowitz (Figure 1). Mention volume remains consistent until late 2020, at which time a16z invests in a bunch of new companies and startups, such as:

• Beacons
• Clubhouse
• Dapper Labs
• Eco
• Helium
• Labster
• Maven
• Nansen
• OpenSea
• Skydio
• SpotOn
• Tackle.io
• Valon
• Zus Health

a16z also focused on the NFT market and, as a result, launched the world’s biggest crypto-fund valued at $2.2 Billion in June 2021. Moreover, Andreessen Horowitz launched its own media property, Future.com, in mid-2021.

Andreessen Horowitz web mentions further spike after it doubles down, announcing $4.5B crypto fund IV in May 2022. Additional news increased mention volume because of its investment in Neumann’s new startups, Flowcarbon and Flow.

Polarity (positive and negative sentiment) dips

Sentiment toward a16z remained relatively stable over time with only minor dips until mid-2021, when it began falling, a trend driven by mentions of Flow investments news, the Uniswap related lawsuit, and suspected CoinSwitch Forex law violations (Figure 2).

Why was Flow affecting a16z’s polarity so much?

Despite Andreessen’s reasons for giving Flow and Neumann a chance, the public’s opinion seems to disagree, leaning toward a negative sentiment (Figure 3). Overall, the public doesn’t seem to trust that Neumann is worth a second chance and that his choices are beyond forgiving. Moreover, the public criticizes a16z’s choice to overlook women and people of color. This The Guardian article highlights tweets of these differences in opinion:

In summary, TextReveal’s web data analysis tells us that it’s essential to keep an eye on the latent ESG risks this investment could bring to a16z’s portfolio, particularly on the social side.

Andreessen Horowitz, from an ESG perspective

a16z ESG initiatives

From a mention volume perspective, a16z’s ESG initiative numbers remain stable (Figure 4). Andreessen Horowitz has a good share of ESG initiatives shares with the highest percentage for governance driven by partnerships and collaborations, followed by the environmental aspect that has been increasing over the last two years.

ESG risks, from a portfolio perspective

Figures 5 and 6 cover 160 companies in Andreessen Horowitz’s portfolio in the venture and growth stage. Overall, a16z’s portfolio represents a lower ESG risk (<15%) over time, except for the occasional moderately higher ESG risks score (<35%) indicated by two prominent spikes, one at the end of 2016 (Q4) and the second at the beginning of the year 2020 during the pandemic (Q1). The first spike is mainly a governance risk related to Soylent’s products being recalled and supply-chain-shortage risks. The spike is also caused by another top executive resigning from Magic Leap. In contrast, the second spike is a social risk driven by Instacart’s employees’ strike upon working conditions and safety concerns during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Note: Very low risk is <5%, low risk is <15%, moderate risk is <=35%, high risk is <=50%, and very high risk is >50%. Also, note that this scale is for demonstration only and does not indicate actual risk values.

Does the public’s view of a16z’s investment of Flow have merit?

Maybe, maybe not.

Looking at Andreessen Horowitz’s company and portfolio through the lens of web data, it is, if anything, consistent with its ESG initiatives and has experienced very few controversies. Should investors ignore the potential red flags that come with Flow and Adam Neumann? Of course not. But they should feel assured that a16z has exhibited a pattern of making sound investments. For example, if we compare the firm’s SDG initiatives to those in its portfolio (Figure 8), they are almost identical.

It’s possible that maybe Marc Andreessen and a16z et al. see something in Flow that the general public does not. After all, it’s why they’re a successful venture capital firm that consistently “backs bold entrepreneurs building the future through technology,” controversies and all.

Reach out to SESAMm

TextReveal’s web data analysis of over five million public and private companies is essential for keeping tabs on ESG investment risks. For example, ESG Alerts provides a better way to research and monitor your investment portfolio. To learn more about how you can analyze web data or to request a demo, reach out to one of our representatives.

Watch the replay of our webinar, "CSDDD Demystified: A Practical Guide for Corporate Sustainability," to gain the actionable insights your business needs to navigate the complexities of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD).

In this session, Kevin Ozadanir, Head of Corporate Sales at SESAMm, and Greta Koch, Technical Negotiator for the European People’s Party on the CSDDD, break down the directive's objectives and provide practical guidance for companies tackling compliance challenges. This is your opportunity to:

• Understand the CSDDD's objectives and its role in strengthening the EU's sustainability agenda.
  
• Learn how the directive compares to other regulations, such as the German Supply Chain Act, and what sets it apart.
• Prepare for compliance by exploring strategies to integrate sustainable systems and address diverse regulatory expectations across the EU.
• Get a blueprint for effective risk analysis and supply chain management tailored to companies operating across multiple jurisdictions.
• Stay ahead of political developments, including the potential repeal of Germany's Supply Chain Act and what it means for global sustainability.

The webinar wraps up with a deep dive into integrating CSDDD with other frameworks, such as the EU Taxonomy and CSRD, and provides a clear roadmap for aligning your operations with evolving corporate sustainability standards.

Don't miss this chance to equip your team with the knowledge to tackle regulatory challenges with confidence. Fill out the form to access the webinar replay now!

As 2025 kicks off, we stopped to take a look at the significant environmental, social, and governance (ESG) controversies of 2024, as we do every year. In this article, we dive into the three public companies with the most controversies for each pillar: environmental, social, and governance, analyzing the companies and the wider impact of the controversies themselves. Join us as we analyze these key moments that have not only influenced public opinion but also shaped the future of responsible business practices.

ESG Risks: Focus 2024

Starting with environmental risks, biodiversity and ecosystems, climate change, waste management, and atmospheric pollution emerged as the most scrutinized sub-risks in 2024. These issues were primarily tied to greenwashing, such as the Mercer Super case and energy companies' expansions at the expense of climate change.

Meanwhile, for social controversies, working conditions and fundamental human rights took center stage. Notably, some companies were linked to forced labor, while coffee supply chains were linked to child labor. Boycotts over the war on Gaza have also been a major highlight of 2024.

Finally, for governance, fraud and legal investigations have been a big driver of controversies, mainly linked to financial fraud cases. This was followed by terrorism financing linked to the war on Gaza, as well as corruption and bribery charges.

Environmental Controversies: Top 3 Public Companies

Shell

In 2024, Shell faced a host of environmental controversies, particularly through its Nigerian subsidiary, Nigeria Delta, which was implicated in serious water pollution due to oil spills. The company dealt with several other notable controversies, including a €15 million compensation related to the spills, a New York City lawsuit over climate change, and a landmark emissions ruling from a Dutch court. Additionally, the company faced condemnation from U.S. lawmakers for alleged greenwashing practices, a carbon credit scandal, and a water contamination lawsuit resolved with a  $230 million settlement.

ExxonMobil

2024 was a challenging year for ExxonMobil. First, its Hammerhead project was hit by an FDA-required Environmental Impact Assessment to evaluate the potential ecological risks. Then, conflicts with Venezuela arose over environmental concerns, followed by several U.S. lawsuits. California, Kansas, and Puerto Rico all sued the company for issues ranging from global plastic pollution and greenwashing to trade law violations. Additionally, ExxonMobil was targeted in a climate lawsuit and faced ongoing fallout from the 1989 oil spill. Protests from groups like CalPERS and student activists highlighted dissatisfaction with ExxonMobil’s environmental practices, emphasizing the company's broad regulatory and public relations challenges.

TotalEnergies

Coming in at number three, TotalEnergies dealt with several environmental controversies, notbably protests related to its East African crude oil pipeline project in Tanzania and Uganda. The company has also been accused of greenwashing and misleading sustainability claims while struggling with oil leaks at its Donges refinery and Egina field. On top of these environmental controversies, TotalEngeries faced key governance and social controversies, including a $48 million fine by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for attempting to manipulate the European gasoline market in March 2018. There are also ongoing investigations into an attack in Mozambique.

Social Controversies: Top 3 Public Companies

Boeing

In 2024, Boeing faced significant challenges due to safety concerns and production controversies, which have fueled employee unrest and public skepticism. Recent incidents, including a missing door plug attachment on a Boeing 737 Max and investigations into quality control lapses at Boeing and its supplier Spirit AeroSystems, have eroded trust among small businesses reliant on the manufacturer. Whistleblower testimonies and increasing scrutiny from Congress and the FAA highlight systemic safety failures. These developments suggest a difficult path ahead for Boeing as it works to regain credibility amid ongoing struggles.

Pfizer

In 2024, Pfizer faced scrutiny after EU documents revealed over 4.9 million adverse events and 3,280 deaths linked to its COVID-19 vaccine, especially among women and individuals aged 31-50. Critics allege Pfizer continued distribution despite knowing the risks, questioning the EMA's approval. Additionally, DNA contaminants, including carcinogenic SV40 sequences, have been reported in the vaccines. A whistleblower disclosed that Pfizer employees were offered a "separate" COVID vaccine, raising concerns about access inequality. Kansas has filed a lawsuit accusing Pfizer of misleading the public about vaccine safety; meanwhile, the company faces fines in the UK for excessive pricing of an anti-epileptic drug.

Meta

In 2024, Meta faced intense scrutiny and legal challenges due to multiple controversies, including a significant data breach, allegations of failing to protect children, and privacy concerns. The company settled a $1.4 billion lawsuit related to facial recognition practices and was fined $220 million by Nigeria for violating data laws. Additional lawsuits from school districts and the Consumer Protection Association highlighted issues related to social media addiction and mental health impacts on teenagers.

Governance Controversies: Top 3 Public Companies

Alphabet

2024 was a legally challenging year for Alphabet, facing numerous antitrust issues globally. For instance, Allegro sued Alphabet for $568 million over anti-competitive practices, and the U.S. Justice Department accused Google of monopolies in the search engine and Android app markets. It has also faced an antitrust ruling, which it plans to appeal. In Europe, Google was scrutinized under the Digital Markets Act and fined 71 million euros in Turkey for anti-competitive behavior. Additionally, France imposed a $271 million fine on Google for using news content without publisher consent, and India began investigating Google's gaming app policies. These incidents highlight Alphabet’s ongoing regulatory battles across multiple continents.

Meta

2024 was not only full of social controversies for Meta. The company also encountered governance challenges across multiple jurisdictions. In Europe, Meta faced hefty fines totaling over €1 billion for a data breach and violating EU antitrust rules, alongside investigations for non-compliance with the Digital Markets Act. The company was also involved in a lawsuit from the AMI media association over advertising practices and investor lawsuits linked to the Cambridge Analytica scandal. In South Korea, Meta was fined $15 million for collecting personal information illegally, and in Ireland, a €91 million GDPR compliance fine was imposed. In addition, further complications arose from EU investigations into potential election interference and foreign disinformation. On top of that, Meta faced new lawsuits in Japan over fake advertisements, illustrating the global extent of its legal and regulatory challenges.

Apple

2024 saw Apple wrestling with significant legal and regulatory issues worldwide. The Democratic Republic of Congo accused Apple of using conflict minerals, raising ethical sourcing concerns. In Europe, Apple settled for $14.4 billion over illegal tax benefits and faced a $2 billion EU antitrust fine related to Spotify. Additional investigations included non-compliance under the EU's Digital Markets Act, anti-competitive probes in Spain, and a UK class action over monopolistic data storage practices. In Brazil, Apple was required to remove restrictions on in-app payments. The company also settled a lawsuit involving an iTunes gift card scam and contended with a patent infringement lawsuit in China from Shanghai Xiao-I, highlighting Apple's extensive legal challenges in its global operations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the controversies surrounding environmental, social, and governance issues in 2024 have underscored the urgent need for accountability and transparency within corporations. As these companies grapple with significant backlash and legal challenges, it is clear that stakeholder expectations are evolving. The demand for responsible practices is louder than ever, and the consequences of neglecting these issues can be severe, impacting not just public perception but also financial stability and sustainability.

SESAMm’s AI Technology Reveals ESG Insights

Discover unparalleled insights into ESG controversies, risks, and opportunities across industries. Learn more about how SESAMm can help you analyze millions of private and public companies using AI-powered text analysis tools.