Over the past decade, many organizations have improved their carbon footprints, from recyclable and biodegradable packaging and single-use plastic to planting trees and reducing their greenhouse gas emissions. However, some businesses and companies looking to boost their eco-friendly image without committing to serious changes and addressing environmental issues have been associated with false green marketing. We call this "Greenwashing."

What is Greenwashing?

Greenpeace and the Environmental Protection Agency define greenwashing as making false and misleading claims about a product's environmental benefits or practices, services, technology, or company practices. Greenwashing typically involves companies spending more money on advertising and marketing than on implementing sustainable business practices that minimize environmental impact. These false green claims can deceive consumers into believing that a product or company is more environmentally friendly than it is, leading to increased sales and profits. As a result, false advertising, misleading initiatives, and groundless claims have increased green investors' exposure to risks emerging from potential lawsuits from activist groups, image deterioration, and some heavy loss in assets invested.

Why is Spotting Greenwashing Important?

Greenwashing is a growing concern for investors as they look to make sustainable and responsible investments. Therefore, spotting greenwashing practices is important for these firms. Here's why.

The deceptive practices used by greenwashers can have significant implications for the integrity of investments made in what investors believe to be sustainably operated companies or sustainable funds. In other words, greenwashing makes it difficult for investors to distinguish between genuinely committed to sustainability companies and those merely making false claims about their environmental practices. As a result, investors may unknowingly invest in companies that are not as sustainable as they claim to be, which can harm their financial returns and the environment. Therefore, it's essential for investors to be aware of greenwashing tactics and to carefully research companies before investing in them to ensure that their investments align with their values and contribute to a more sustainable future.

What Are the Challenges to Detecting Greenwashing?

It's challenging to produce an accurate assessment of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, which gives companies the opportunity to cover or hide ineffective and fake green initiatives.
According to Regtank, some of the main challenges to detecting greenwashing practices are the following:

• Lack of reporting standards: some investors believe that we haven’t universally agreed upon a set of standards to determine whether a product is ESG compliant.
  
• Lack of transparency: greenwashing companies don’t disclose the specificities of their “green campaigns,” which makes it difficult for investors and consumers to fact-check and evaluate their sustainability claims.
• Limited consumer awareness: false marketing strategies could be based on a combination of the consumer’s eco-consciousness and brand loyalty. As a result, consumers become less aware of the misleading strategies greenwashing companies use to sell their products.

Ultimately, these factors may contribute to the inaccuracy and limitations of ESG data and scores, which makes it easier for greenwashers to get away with their false marketing campaigns. Consequently, detecting greenwashing requires scrutiny of environmental claims made by companies and an understanding of the complex supply chains and manufacturing processes involved in producing products and services.

To learn more about greenwashing and have access to real-life case studies, download this comprehensive report:

How Does Artificial Intelligence Detect Greenwashing?

As greenwashing practices increase, activist investors, experts, journalists, and even the general public are spreading awareness of the issue using social media, news outlets, forums, and blogs, among other means.
Recently, artificial intelligence (AI), particularly natural language processing (NLP), has proven to be effective in the early detection of greenwashing by analyzing vast amounts of qualitative data publicly available on the web. At SESAMm, for example, we apply our NLP capabilities to identify companies likely to engage in greenwashing practices by analyzing text in billions of web-based articles. Our data lake contains over 25 billion web–sourced articles, sourced from four million news, blogs, social media, and forum discussions on five million public and private companies in more than 100 languages. We run these articles through our AI platform tool, TextReveal®, and systematically craft reliable, timely, and comprehensive insights to detect greenwashing, generate ESG alerts, and identify related risks.

The Rise of Greenwashing

Greenwashing, the deceptive practice where companies claim to be more environmentally friendly than they actually are, has become a growing concern in recent years. By analyzing the frequency of web mentions of greenwashing over time, we can observe important trends and understand the factors contributing to this phenomenon.

Recent analyses indicate a significant increase in greenwashing mentions since late 2019. This rise aligns with a growing public awareness of the climate emergency and the increase in media outlets and social media accounts dedicated to exposing greenwashing. The number of mentions escalated from fewer than 200 to over 23,000 in the last quarter of 2023, highlighting the increasing scrutiny of corporate environmental claims.

A noteworthy pattern is the regular occurrence of spikes in greenwashing mentions during the third quarter over the past three years. This timing corresponds with the "pre-COP" periods, leading to critical international climate change management conferences. These periods see heightened discussions around sustainability, with increased attention on companies' environmental practices.

Greenwashing in the Energy Sector

The energy sector, particularly the oil industry, has faced significant scrutiny regarding greenwashing. In this context, companies like Shell and ENI have been prominent due to the frequency of greenwashing mentions associated with them.

For Shell and ENI, the volume of greenwashing mentions has fluctuated, with notable increases in specific quarters. For example, Shell saw spikes in mentions during the second quarter of both 2021 and 2022 while experiencing a drop in the third quarter of 2022. ENI has faced similar fluctuations, often linked to legal actions and publicized environmental issues.

Shell's Greenwashing Mentions, ESG Risks, and Initiatives

Shell, a British multinational and prominent player in this sector, has faced considerable scrutiny for such practices. The company has experienced notable spikes in greenwashing mentions and has been involved in several ESG-related risks.

Greenwashing Mentions

We can see an increase in greenwashing mentions in the first half of 2023. Around that period, Shell faced allegations and lawsuits concerning its environmental claims. The company was criticized for misleading U.S. authorities and investors about its energy transition efforts. Additionally, Shell faced public backlash for labeling fossil gas as 'renewable' while reporting record profits. A notable incident involved a shareholder suing Shell's executives over climate risks.

ESG Risks

Shell has faced several ESG-related risks, including legal challenges and pollution issues. In 2021, the company was sued by New York City over climate change-related advertising and filed an arbitration claim against Nigeria concerning a spill dispute. In March 2023, Shell faced another oil spill, this time in another region in Nigeria,  Rivers State, and also saw institutional investors backing a lawsuit against its board over climate risks. The mid-2023 period saw Shell agreeing to pay $10 million for air pollution violations at a Pennsylvania petrochemical plant. Despite its net-zero pledge, the company announced plans to increase fossil fuel production.

ESG Initiatives

Despite its challenges, Shell has also engaged in various sustainability initiatives. In late 2021, the company announced plans to purchase power from the world's largest offshore wind farm. Mid-2022 saw a leadership change with the company's CEO stepping down as Shell aimed to align with its climate goals. The company also planned to deploy 10,000 EV chargers across India as part of its global strategy. In mid-2023, Shell committed to investing $10–15 billion in developing low-carbon energy solutions. Although the company abandoned its lower oil production target, it maintained its commitment to reducing emissions.

Shell's journey underscores the challenges of aligning environmental claims with real actions, emphasizing the importance of transparency and genuine sustainability efforts.

ENI's Greenwashing Mentions, ESG Risks, and Initiatives

ENI, an Italian multinational oil and gas company, has faced scrutiny for such practices. The company has experienced fluctuations in greenwashing mentions and has been involved in a number of ESG-related risks.

Greenwashing Mentions

ENI's greenwashing mentions are fairly low. However, the company has been featured in discussions about greenwashing, especially with recent developments. In early 2022, the company faced criticism for inconsistencies in emissions data and greenwashing activities, as highlighted by the Sereno Regis Study Center. Greenpeace also criticized ENI for using the Sanremo Music Festival as a platform for greenwashing. In May 2023, ENI faced a lawsuit for allegedly lobbying and greenwashing to promote fossil fuels despite being aware of their environmental risks. Greenpeace sued the company, accusing it of knowingly contributing to climate change.

ESG Risks

Over the past 4 years, the oil giant's ESG risks have been few but not inexistent. ENI has encountered several risks, including legal challenges and pollution issues. In 2022, ENI's environmental strategy was deemed a failure, and concerns arose about a pipeline spill into the East Irish Sea. The company also faced legal actions in 2021, including an appeal against a court ruling in an illegal waste case and warnings from the Legality Network to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or face prosecution.

The company faced a lawsuit in early 2023 for allegedly having prior knowledge of the climate crisis. In another incident, a report found that ENI and Shell were responsible for significant pollution in Bayelsa, requiring a $12 billion cleanup.

ESG Initiatives

Despite facing ESG risks, it is visible that ENI has also pursued various sustainability initiatives. In early 2022, ENI and British Petroleum finalized an agreement to create a new independent joint venture in Angola, which will support the energy needs of Angola's growing economy and its decarbonization path and strengthen its role as a global LNG player. In late 2023, the company received Gold Standard recognition from the United Nations for its commitment to reducing methane emissions. ENI also partnered with Luiss University to launch an international network focused on African energy transition and collaborated with RINA to accelerate maritime decarbonization.
ENI has shown interest in renewable energy, as demonstrated by its wave energy project in Pantelleria and its plans for fusion energy in collaboration with Commonwealth Fusion Systems. The company also focuses on sustainable mobility, developing diesel from 100% renewable materials, and promoting clean energy through partnerships.

Shell and ENI both face the challenge of balancing economic interests with environmental responsibility. Despite allegations of greenwashing and environmental risks, both companies have taken steps towards sustainability, such as investing in low-carbon solutions and renewable energy projects. Their experiences highlight the importance of transparency, genuine commitment to environmental responsibility, and the role of public scrutiny in holding companies accountable.

Greenwashing and ESG Investing

In sum, certain companies advertise their sustainability and green initiatives, while in reality, they are making false claims and practicing greenwashing, as evidenced by our analysis using SESAMm's AI and ESG reports. We use AI through TextReveal to generate alternative data for use cases, such as ESG and SDG, sentiment, private equity due diligence, corporate studies, and more. Our technologies can reliably ensure the credibility of ecological initiatives and serve global investment firms, corporations, and investors, such as private equity firms, hedge funds, and other asset management firms, to enhance their investment strategies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the issue of greenwashing represents a substantial obstacle in the journey towards genuine environmental sustainability, misleading consumers and investors and diluting the efforts of genuine sustainable enterprises. Nevertheless, the emergence of advanced technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) indicated a new era of accountability. Innovators like SESAMm are at the forefront, deploying these technologies to effectively unravel and counteract greenwashing practices. This empowers investors, asset, and portfolio managers to discern and align their resources with legitimately sustainable entities. The call to action is clear: a collective demand for transparency and responsibility is crucial.

Reach out to SESAMm

TextReveal’s web data analysis of over five million public and private companies is essential for keeping tabs on ESG investment risks. To learn more about how you can analyze web data or to request a demo, reach out to one of our representatives.

The world of private equity has been fertile ground for the adoption of alternative data, including AI-driven insights from firms like SESAMm, an expert in Natural Language Processing (NLP).

Could SESAMm’s technology provide Carlyle with the tools to identify a better class of investment opportunity?

When SESAMm’s CEO Sylvain Forté met the man in charge of data at The Carlyle Group, at an industry conference, the opportunity arose to put SESAMm’s data to the test.

“I remember the first day I met Sylvain and he said, I can tell you if your company is trending positively or negatively on the internet,” recounts Matt Anderson, Chief Data Officer of Carlyle, at a recent PE Insights webinar, in which EQT and Apollo were also speaking. Sensing potential in the data, he decided to give it a go.

SESAMm’s NLP platform generates quantitative and qualitative analytics on a wide array of entities – from public and private companies, to brands, products and individuals, by running cutting edge algorithms across billions of web-based articles.

Their data lake is not limited to news stories from the New York Times or Wall Street Journal, but spans a whole variety of global sources – social media, blog posts, professional forums, customer reviews and more, in over 100 languages.

Using this ability to interpret unstructured text from a huge slice of the internet, SESAMm’s team created insights designed to help Matt’s deal teams evaluate target companies.

The challenge was getting investment professionals to buy into the value of alternative data for private companies, so SESAMm condensed everything into easily-digestible reports. They included time-series and charts measuring companies on a variety of key metrics versus their peers, including ESG risk, e-reputation, competitive positioning, sentiment, positive and negative themes and other critical KPIs.

By regularly presenting SESAMm’s analytics reports to investment committees, Sylvain and Matt hoped to gradually convince deal teams that alternative data could have a positive impact on the investment process.

“It was about sharing the data in the form of slides directly with deal teams in a way that was automated on our side but easily consumable as part of the pre-deal decision process”, said Forté.

“We saw the need to convince people and show, time after time, that it really works, that this data is really valuable and can give an edge”, added Forté.

“In some instances it helped us to not make investments or avoid allocating resources to things that were marginal or moving in the wrong direction, and that was really valuable”, said Anderson.

To further prove the value of the data, Matt asked Sylvain to create analytics reports on a selection of Carlyle’s historical target companies. The idea was to see if SESAMm’s scores and analytics were predictive of the deal outcome, whether positive or negative.

“If we put a number on how positive SESAMm feels about some of these deals between one and ten, with one being, ‘avoid at all costs’ , and ten, ‘go for it’, what would it have told us?”, said Anderson.

After running the back test, the results showed a clear correlation between SESAMm’s analysis, and the deals that performed well and those that fell through.

“Looking at the results, I think that people would have really paused an investment committee around some of the conclusions”, commented Anderson.

“Having a view of the themes being surfaced, the plateaus in certain trends, and the sentiment charts heading in a negative direction was eye-opening for our leaders and deal teams – because they had to actually live through those deals. So seeing that kind of data, and what it can help you avoid was really insightful.” Says Anderson.

Ultimately, the integration of SESAMm’s analytics reports into Carlyle’s investment process was so successful that they were rolled out across all global investment teams. The two companies have developed a strong partnership based on the proven value of alternative data in the private equity investment process.

To find out how SESAMm can support your investment decision-making, to request a demo or for any other questions regarding our data do not hesitate to contact info@sesamm.com.

In recent years, consumers have become increasingly conscious about the impact of their purchases on the environment and society. As a result, many companies have jumped on the bandwagon of sustainability and green initiatives to attract consumers who prioritize ethical and environmentally friendly products. However, not all companies are authentic in their claims and practices, leading to a phenomenon known as greenwashing. In the first article of this two-part series, we gave an in-depth analysis of reputational laundering and greenwashing. In this article, we will explore the prevalence of greenwashing across various industries. We will also study the case of a company practicing greenwashing and a genuinely sustainable company.

Reputational Laundering by Industry

Reputational laundering is a common practice across various industries. Traditionally, the ‘Oil and Gas’ and ‘Financial’ industries have been identified as the main culprits. However, we have recently observed a substantial increase in the frequency of mentions in the ‘Food & Drug Retail’ industry, surpassing all other sectors by a significant margin. To evaluate this trend, we calculated the percentage of reputational laundering mentions in relation to the total number of mentions for each industry.

Reputational laundering over time

We looked at the last three years to find how each industry has evolved. Most industries have remained fairly static within a reasonable range. However, ‘Industrials’ have seen a significant decrease in mentions. Conversely, ‘Oil and Gas’ and ‘Food & Drug Retail’ significantly increased in 2023.

‘Food & Drug Retail’ more than tripled its mentions percentage due to a large number of mislabeled eco-friendly products (Walmart & Kohl’s) and green initiatives claims (Coca-Cola, Unilever, Amazon…).

The ‘Oil and Gas’ industry ranked second, and its recent spike can be associated mainly with greenwashing on actions such as their direct negative impact on the environment and the impact on local communities (TotalEnergies - Uganda & Tanzania). Another example is related to sportswashing with ‘Oil and Gas’ advertising heavily in sports events and even sponsoring sports clubs.

The financial industry has seen a decrease in mentions in 2023. However, its overall numbers are still significant. Most mentions we found were related to their investment activities in fossil fuels (HSBC to stop funding new oil and gas fields after greenwashing criticism. Goldman Sachs Facing SEC Probe of ESG Funds in Asset Management).

When examining the prevalence of reputational risks across sectors, greenwashing is the predominant concern in most industries. This is particularly evident in sectors like Industrials, Oil & Gas, and Financials, where greenwashing mentions are especially prominent. On the other hand, Telecommunications & Social Media stands out as an exception, with the bulk of its mentions skewing towards colorwashing, which encompasses specific practices such as blackwashing and sportswashing (Netflix accused of 'blackwashing' new docu-series Queen Cleopatra by casting black British actress).

• Oil & Gas: Oil Majors Shell and BP Accused of Greenwashing by Greenpeace, Research Reveals Minimal Renewable Energy Generation and Inadequate Investments – Technology Solutions for Home (itsforhome.com)
• Food & Retail: Costco class action claims retailer falsely advertises cranberry juice as containing no preservatives - Top Class Actions
  Kellogg beats claims it falsely advertised ‘veggie’ Morningstar meatless products - Top Class Actions
  Costco, Dreyer's ice cream bar class actions over false advertising claims dismissed - Top Class Actions
  Walmart class action alleges company misleads consumers over amount of olive oil in mayonnaise - Top Class Actions
• Financials: SEC sanctions Deutsche Bank for greenwashing, AML violations | Investment Executive

Use Case: Focus on the Financial Industry

The financial industry's footprint in reputational laundering might not be the most pronounced in terms of direct mentions, but its influence stretches wide via its investment activities in other sectors. This means the ripple effect of the financial sector's actions can be substantially more impactful than those in other industries. Our investigation into this phenomenon included a rigorous examination of the frequency with which financial institutions are cited in discussions of greenwashing. Additionally, we assessed their efforts in driving positive impact initiatives. We scrutinized a group of 144 financial entities, arranging them on a scale from the greatest to the least number of greenwashing mentions in proportion to their overall volume of mentions.

Top financial firms by greenwashing claims

Below, we listed the financial firms with the highest relative volume of greenwashing mentions. Beyond the first two institutions on the list, which are related and had a big scandal in 2022, we can see many very recognizable names, such as Blackrock (investing in fossil fuels), JP Morgan (for fossil fuel investment policies), and HSBC (false advertising green claims) making our top ten list.

Case Study: DWS Group

The DWS Group, previously known as Deutsche Asset Management, found itself in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons in 2022 and 2023. The scandal landed them at the top of our list, a position highlighted by the significant number of mentions they received — a figure that is an order of magnitude higher than that of any other entity on the list.

As a German asset management firm under the umbrella of Deutsche Bank, DWS was embroiled in severe greenwashing allegations. The last two years were marked by high-drama events: starting with greenwashing allegations at the end of 2021, their offices were searched in May 2022, which led to the resignation of the DWS chief in June 2022. The saga concluded with a substantial $25 million fine paid to U.S. regulators in September 2023.

The accompanying chart provides a visual representation of the timeline for these events, contrasting the number of absolute mentions with those specifically related to greenwashing. The alignment in the timing and scale of these mentions with the unfolding events is unmistakable.

Best-in-class companies

In our effort to wrap up our study on an optimistic note, it's important to recognize that the heightened scrutiny of greenwashing and its associated initiatives ultimately serves a beneficial role by significantly raising our collective consciousness about crucial ESG issues.

While it's true that numerous companies have come under fire for greenwashing, it's equally important to highlight those that are genuinely advancing initiatives with positive environmental and social repercussions across the globe.

Employing the same method used to scrutinize financial firms implicated in greenwashing, we focused on the same group of 144 companies, honing in on the top 10 that stood out based on normalized mentions of their positive environmental actions.

The findings are quite encouraging: mentions of these positive initiatives dwarf those of negative impacts when viewed as a proportion of total mentions. Brookfield Asset Management (Brookfield) shines as the most notable, garnering almost double the mentions of its closest peer.

Also noteworthy is BlackRock's appearance on this list. Despite its presence on the greenwashing list, BlackRock has made strides in positive efforts, too. The company's initiatives—some counterbalancing the negative—have received more attention for their positive impact than for greenwashing, suggesting a complex but proactive ESG engagement.

Furthermore, companies like EQT, Berkshire Hathaway, and Standard & Poor's have actively engaged in initiatives that drive positive impact, earning them significant—and rightfully so—media coverage.

Case Study: Brookfield Asset Management

Brookfield's presence on our top 10 list is well-founded, reflecting the substantial conversation around their significant efforts in environmental sustainability. The company has undertaken numerous initiatives aimed at reducing its ecological impact. These include launching a $7 Billion Global Energy Transition Fund, collaboration on a sustainable neighborhood project in Texas, a commitment to planting thousands of trees, and the transition to zero-emission electricity in their offices.

In terms of visibility, these environmental initiatives represent a significant portion of the company’s profile, surpassing 50% of total mentions in September 2022. This highlights the dominant role these actions play in the public discourse surrounding Brookfield.

The company’s polarity(1) — a measure of sentiment in mentions — shows a steady and positive trajectory beginning in late 2021. This trend points to a growing positive reputation and increased positive online discussions regarding the company.

Web Sentiment Analysis: Financial Industry vs. DWS & Brookfield

When assessing the landscape of ESG engagement within the financial sector, we consider the comparative reputations of two key players: the leader in positive impact initiatives against the firm with the highest number of greenwashing mentions. How do they stack up against the broader sentiment within the financial industry?

The finance industry at large grapples with a challenging reputation shaped by various issues, including regulatory shortcomings, perceived corporate greed, opacity, and environmental impacts, among others.

Against this backdrop, we observe that:

DWS: The company's reputation trajectory is on a downward slope compared to the industry average, with the aftereffects of recent controversies culminating in a reputation low as of October 2023.

Brookfield: In contrast, Brookfield's commitment to the environment appears to buoy its reputation, maintaining a consistently positive trend that surpasses the market standard. Notably, from January 2023 onward, there is a discernible uptick in positive sentiment.

Conclusion

While the prevalence of greenwashing poses a considerable challenge within the corporate sphere, our study reveals a silver lining. The intensive scrutiny and debate surrounding environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues have led to heightened awareness and, more importantly, action. Amidst the cacophony of claims, our analysis has found a discernible pattern of positive ESG initiatives overshadowing negative impacts, indicating a shift towards genuine sustainability efforts.

Particularly encouraging is the performance of certain frontrunners like Brookfield Asset Management, which has emerged as a beacon of positive action, outpacing its peers in driving meaningful change. This illustrates the potential for firms to lead by example and underscores the importance of rigorous analysis in distinguishing substantive ESG commitments from superficial ones.

Ultimately, this study underscores the transformative power of informed scrutiny and the pivotal role that advanced analytical tools play in propelling the ESG agenda forward. As the financial community continues to refine its approaches to evaluating ESG metrics, we can remain cautiously optimistic about the journey from mere green-tinted narratives to deeply rooted, impactful corporate practices.

(1) Polarity aggregates positive and negative sentiment (opinions, reviews) on a company. It ranges from -1 to 1. A 0 score means that positive and negative sentiment are equal. Well-regarded brands generally have polarity scores over 0.5.

At SESAMm, we used AI to study billions of articles and analyze greenwashing trends. Download this comprehensive ebook for an in-depth understanding of the evolving landscape of reputational laundering, notably greenwashing, and dive into its trends in the corporate world.

SESAMm’s AI Technology Reveals ESG Insights

Discover unparalleled insights into ESG controversies, risks, and opportunities across industries. Learn more about how SESAMm can help you analyze millions of private and public companies using AI-powered text analysis tools.