Ebook: Unmasking Greenwashing: How to Identify Genuine and Deceiving Sustainability Initiatives with AI
November 15, 2023
•
5 mins read
In our latest research, “Unmasking Greenwashing with AI” our ESG and Research & Analytics teams provide a comprehensive analysis of greenwashing trends using AI-powered text analysis.
Notable increase in mentions of greenwashing, with a 3.3x rise since 2021.
This increase suggests both a real growth in deceptive sustainability practices and a rise in public awareness.
Greenwashing represents 55% of all reputational laundering, underscoring a major shift towards environmental deception.
Surge in climate lawsuits with over 3x increase in climate change lawsuits since 2020, highlighting legal risks for misleading practices
It underscores the financial sector’s dual role in both contributing to and fighting against greenwashing through its investment practices
The aerospace and defense industry is essential to global technology and transportation, playing a crucial role in maintaining international security and connectivity. However, this sector faces intense scrutiny due to its significant impact on ESG factors. Amidst challenges like safety lapses and whistleblower revelations, stakeholders are increasingly relying on advanced AI technologies to gain insights into potential controversies. Such technologies have enabled a deeper understanding of the complex ESG issues that permeate the industry, revealing not only the specific challenges faced by companies like Boeing but also providing a broader view of the sector's commitment to corporate responsibility and sustainability.
This article explores the aerospace industry and its ESG challenges, backed up by a case study of industry giant Boeing. It also explains how we used SESAMm’s AI-powered tools to detect these controversies beforehand.
Aerospace and Defense Market Mentions
The top market players in the aerospace and defense industry command 8.3% of the overall market's online mentions. This sector is increasingly scrutinized for its ESG practices amidst technological advancements and global policy shifts.
Media Sentiment in the Aerospace Industry
In this study, we ran our AI tools through our data lake to extract the major market players: Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Airbus, and Boeing, with the time frame starting from 2015 to date. The data reveals a notable peak in online mentions of the market trend, mainly following Boeing’s plane crash controversies. Post-2018, we noticed a general upward trend for Airbus and Boeing, indicating their increasing dominance or recovery in the market. This trend demonstrates the shifting landscape of the aerospace industry, where competition is intense, and the share of mentions can reflect broader market movements and company-specific developments.
(*): Polarity or sentiment polarity represents a company's aggregate of positive and negative sentiment (opinions, reviews), ranging from -1 to 1. A zero score means that there is as much positive as negative sentiment. High e-reputation brands can have polarity scores of more than 0.5.
The sentiment across the aerospace market reflects the industry’s highs and lows. On one hand, there are moments of significant achievements like new contracts and technological breakthroughs that drive companies like Lockheed Martin to positive media highlights. Between 2016 and 2018, Lockheed Martin experienced a surge in positive mentions due to key contract wins and proactive company initiatives, which have contributed to maintaining its reputation and market value.
Conversely, the industry faces intense scrutiny over various controversies, notably those surrounding Boeing. The company, a dominant figure in the market, has been at the center of numerous negative headlines, giving it the lowest sentiment polarity among its peers. Issues range from serious safety lapses, such as the tragic 737 MAX crashes throughout the years, to ongoing legal challenges and whistleblower claims that overshadow its governance practices. These incidents have not only affected Boeing’s sentiment negatively but have also influenced the overall perception of the aerospace and defense sector, highlighting the industry's susceptibility to reputational risks.
Macro Themes
The aerospace sector, while essential for global connectivity, has not been without its controversies, especially concerning safety and compliance issues. Among the major players, Boeing's significant share of media mentions is primarily driven by a series of high-profile accidents, including the 737 MAX crashes in 2019, killing all passengers and another serious incident in South China in 2022. These accidents triggered a cascade of lawsuits and fines, severely impacting Boeing’s public perception and operational standing. The aftermath of these incidents also precipitated broader discussions around leadership changes, management practices, safety protocols, and accountability measures within the company.
Similarly, Airbus has faced its own challenges, with notable accidents in 2015 in France and 2016 in the Mediterranean Sea, followed by another in 2020, resulting in 97 fatalities. These incidents underline the persistent safety risks inherent in aerospace operations and the critical need for stringent oversight. Accusations of ethical and legal violations also loom large across the industry. Boeing, for example, has been embroiled in numerous investigations and lawsuits related to various accusations. Meanwhile, other industry giants like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin have faced legal actions over environmental and contracting practices, such as Northrop’s involvement in residential chemical contamination and Lockheed’s settlement over accusations of overcharging the Navy. General Dynamics has also encountered legal scrutiny over employment practices and allegations of human rights and privacy violations.
These controversies highlight a complex landscape of operational, legal, and ethical challenges in the aerospace industry. Each incident not only affects the involved company but also catalyzes shifts in regulatory practices and leadership strategies, underscoring the need for robust governance and proactive risk management to uphold safety and integrity in aerospace operations.
ESG Analysis
The influence of ESG factors on public perception and internal company policies within the aerospace industry is profound. Governance issues, in particular, continue to be a critical focus as aerospace companies confront challenges related to compliance, ethical practices, and transparency. Social factors are also prominent, with labor practices and safety standards critically influencing operational and strategic decision-making. Environmental considerations are escalating in importance as the industry progresses towards more sustainable practices, driven by increasing concerns over climate change and environmental sustainability.
Northrop Grumman illustrates an aspect of ESG concerns with specific environmental risks linked to its operations. Accusations have surfaced against Northrop Grumman for its role in environmental degradation, such as pollution from manufacturing plants and involvement in contamination incidents at residential sites. These issues not only affect the company’s environmental track record but also impact its social standing and governance integrity. The company also displays some governance risks related to its total mentions volume driven by accusations of fueling false ‘Revenge Porn’ allegations against CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou as well as legal investigations driven by Northrop Grumman investors over its claims to recover their losses and class action lawsuits over claims of a breach of fiduciary duty.
The aerospace sector’s engagement with these ESG factors indicates a shift towards addressing the critical issues facing the industry. Boeing ranks first in terms of risks, with social risks having the highest share, followed by Airbus, with risks coming from social issues such as customer relations, fundamental human rights, and governance risks mainly related to its fraud, bribery, and corruption charges. This shift is not just about mitigating risks but also about harnessing opportunities to enhance corporate responsibility and ensure long-term sustainability.
Deep Dive into Boeing: ESG Risks and Public Perception
The aerospace industry has faced increasing scrutiny over its ESG practices. Among the key players, the American aerospace company Boeing has been prominently featured in media discussions, not only due to its market distinction but also because of its ESG challenges that have sparked significant controversy.
Boeing Word Cloud
This word cloud visually represents the main online topics surrounding Boeing, particularly focusing on the issues and controversies related to the 737 Max aircraft. Key terms like "737 Max," "Boeing," "safety," "death," and "FAA" are prominently displayed, indicating these as central themes in the discussion. The size of each word in the cloud signifies its frequency and importance in related discussions, with larger words being more prevalent. This visualization encapsulates a range of associated topics such as "lawsuit," "Senate hearing," and "missed inspections," highlighting the broad spectrum of regulatory, safety, and ethical issues that have dominated public and media discourse regarding Boeing.
Boeing ESG Analysis
According to TextReveal’s findings, since 2019, Boeing's ESG risks have intensified, particularly in social and governance, leading to a substantial impact on its public image and stock performance. The company's struggles with governance issues are well-documented, encompassing major safety lapses that resulted in the tragic crashes of the 737 MAX aircraft in the span of six months in Indonesia and Ethiopia. These events have not only led to a loss of life but also raised serious questions about the company's commitment to safety protocols and ethical standards.
Social risks at Boeing are also prominent, with multiple incidents involving customer relations and human capital management. Notably, the company has faced significant scrutiny regarding its response to the 737 MAX crashes, highlighting deficiencies in transparency and accountability in dealing with the fallout. The handling of these incidents resulted in widespread public distrust, significantly damaging Boeing's relationships with airlines, regulatory bodies, and the flying public. Issues such as delays in disclosing software malfunctions and the initial reluctance to ground the fleet have led to accusations of prioritizing profit over passenger safety. Furthermore, Boeing's labor practices have also come under fire. There have been multiple instances of tension with labor unions over contract negotiations, job cuts, and factory conditions, which exacerbate the social risks by affecting employee morale and productivity. These labor disputes and the perceived erosion of safety standards contribute to a challenging environment, complicating Boeing's efforts to rebuild trust and ensure operational stability.
Early Signs: Whistleblowers
We used TextReveal's analytics capabilities to track the prevalence of whistleblower mentions within the aerospace industry, with data pointing back as far as 2019. This tool has effectively highlighted ongoing concerns and patterns related to corporate governance and safety issues.
Boeing has also been facing whistleblower retaliation. High-profile cases involving whistleblowers like John Barnett, who was found dead under mysterious circumstances, and Sam Salehpour, who reported safety shortcuts and received physical threats, illustrate the perilous environment for those who challenge the status quo. These whistleblowers' stories, while distressing, shed light on a culture that may prioritize expediency over thoroughness and safety.
One of the most significant cases involved John Barnett, a former quality manager at Boeing, who raised alarms about critical safety lapses in the production of the 787 Dreamliner. Barnett claimed that faulty parts were knowingly installed on planes, potentially endangering passengers. His revelations were met with hostility and retaliation, resulting in his tragic and suspicious death, which was officially ruled as a suicide. This case has fueled widespread media coverage and public outcry, questioning the integrity of Boeing’s internal safety practices and the treatment of employees who report such critical issues.
Another well-known whistleblower, Ed Pierson, reported concerns about the 737 MAX's manufacturing process, specifically pointing to the rushed production schedules that he believed compromised safety. His testimony before congressional hearings helped to expose a "profit over safety" mentality that appeared to saturate Boeing’s management practices. Pierson’s allegations were particularly damaging as they were directly linked to the two fatal crashes of the 737 MAX, which tragically resulted in 346 deaths.
Sam Salehpour, a Boeing engineer, also came forward with allegations of manufacturing shortcuts that compromised the structural integrity and safety of Boeing aircraft. Like others, Salehpour faced significant backlash from superiors and was reportedly blackballed within the industry for his outspokenness, highlighting the severe personal and professional risks faced by whistleblowers within the air travel giant.
The cumulative effect of these whistleblower cases has led to significant scrutiny from regulatory bodies, the media, and the public. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has stepped up its oversight of Boeing, leading to fines, increased regulations, and a temporary grounding of the 737 MAX fleet. These incidents have sparked broader discussions about the need for systemic reforms within the aerospace industry to ensure that safety and ethical standards are not only upheld but prioritized over financial incentives.
How does SESAMm Detect ESG
Navigating the vast amounts of data available is a significant challenge when conducting this type of analysis. At SESAMm, our experts begin with a comprehensive sentiment analysis of the industry and its key players. By examining trends, particularly spikes in data volume or shifts in sentiment—both positive and negative—they can pinpoint the issues and controversies driving these changes. Following this, our team conducts a thematic deep dive into the topics most relevant to the industry, providing a nuanced understanding of the issues that are particularly sensitive for stakeholders. With these insights in hand, our team then moves to company-specific analyses and benchmarking to assess how individual companies perform relative to their peers.
SESAMm's TextReveal® platform plays a significant role in identifying and understanding the complex web of controversies within industries such as aerospace. Through its algorithms, the platform sifts through vast amounts of data from diverse sources like news outlets, social media, and corporate disclosures to detect subtle cues and patterns that might indicate emerging ESG controversies. This robust data collection and analysis enable SESAMm to pinpoint issues related to whistleblower activities, safety violations, and governance lapses well before they gain widespread attention. By integrating this intelligence, SESAMm facilitates a deeper understanding of the underlying factors contributing to these controversies, aiding stakeholders in navigating the intricate dynamics of corporate accountability and regulatory compliance.
SESAMm's TextReveal® platform provides a comprehensive suite of ESG analytics tools that leverage extensive data collection from news outlets, social media, corporate disclosures, and NGO reports, ensuring thorough coverage of emerging and underreported ESG issues. Utilizing advanced artificial intelligence, the platform analyzes sentiments and contextual nuances within this data to identify positive and negative ESG indicators, helps stakeholders measure public sentiment before issues escalate, and makes accurate business decisions. Additionally, its capability to identify and map relationships between entities such as companies, individuals, and products to various ESG issues is crucial for assessing how internal dynamics influence a company’s overall ESG profile.
TextReveal® also employs predictive analytics to foresee potentil ESG controversies, enabling proactive risk management and strategic planning. Moreover, it offers detailed ESG reporting and scoring, providing quantifiable insights into a company’s ESG performance, which is invaluable for investors and analysts. Lastly, the platform’s analysis of the influence of key individuals on ESG practices offers deeper insights into leadership effectiveness and ethical compliance, making SESAMm's tools essential for integrating ESG considerations into comprehensive corporate strategy and maintaining competitive advantage in a socially conscious market environment.
Conclusion
Navigating the complexities of ESG risk management requires a shift from traditional methods to more advanced, AI-driven approaches. AI's ability to analyze vast amounts of unstructured data enables early detection of hidden risks, as demonstrated in our case study on Boeing. Using AI, we identified emerging controversies around Boeing's safety practices, quality control, and governance issues before they escalated, showcasing the technology's potential for proactive risk management.
Incorporating AI into ESG assessments allows private equity firms and other stakeholders to move beyond reactive strategies. By detecting potential risks early, firms can safeguard their investments, protect their reputations, and align with a growing emphasis on responsible investing. Embracing AI-driven tools is not just about keeping pace with market demands—it's about ensuring a more secure, transparent, and sustainable approach to investment in an ESG-focused world.
Reach out to SESAMm
TextReveal’s web data analysis of over five million public and private companies is essential for keeping tabs on ESG investment risks. To learn more about how you can analyze web data or to request a demo, reach out to one of our representatives.
Accelerate due diligence and uncover hidden risks across your supplier network with reliable, source-backed insights.
Following the successful launch of our ESG Assessment and Secondaries & Credit Screening reports, SESAMm is excited to unveil the third report in our growing suite of AI-generated screening solutions: Supply Chain Screening.
This report is designed specifically for procurement teams, compliance officers, and risk managers who need a fast, scalable way to screen suppliers against exclusion lists, whether for onboarding, third-party due diligence, or ongoing monitoring.
With just a list of company names, the report flags potential involvement in restricted or high-risk business activities, helping you identify potential exposure to sensitive sectors such as:
Fossil Fuels & Nuclear
Weapons & Military Equipment
Predatory Lending
Gambling & Betting
Adult & Violent Content
Severe Human Rights & Labor Violations
Tobacco, Alcohol & Recreational Drugs
Each result is backed by cited sources and a clear explanation of why the company was flagged, bringing transparency to your decision-making process. Delivered in a structured, easy-to-share format, the report helps teams move beyond static exclusion lists and legacy classifications to surface material and reputational risks across their supplier network.
Supply chain complexity is growing - and so is scrutiny from regulators, customers, and investors. With SESAMm’s Supply Chain Screening Report, you can meet this challenge head-on.
As AI continues to reshape how risk and compliance teams operate, we’re expanding our report offerings to cover even more use cases and industries. Stay tuned for what’s next.
Want to see the report in action?
Contact us to learn more or request a sample tailored to your needs.
In recent years, the field of natural language processing (NLP) has seen significant advancements that have enabled more effective processing and analysis of large volumes of textual data. This has had major and disrupting implications for many industries, including finance and investment.
One area where NLP has been particularly useful is in the design of baskets and indices on all asset classes. One of them, where we can definitely observe key value-added, is related to digital assets and cryptocurrencies. A crypto basket is a group of cryptocurrencies that are bundled together and traded as a single unit, while a crypto index is a measurement of the overall performance of a group of cryptocurrencies.
Traditionally, the process of designing a crypto basket or index involved manually selecting a group of cryptocurrencies based on various criteria such as market capitalization, trading volume, and price history. However, this process is time-consuming and can be subject to bias. Moreover, it can be difficult for investors to invest in the crypto market as a whole. NLP technology has allowed it to analyze vast amounts of data from various sources such as news, articles, social media posts, and blogs to identify trends and sentiment around specific cryptocurrencies. This information can then be used to inform the design of crypto baskets and indices, making them more accurate and reflective of market sentiment.
By leveraging sentiment analysis through NLP-based indicators, robust indices can be created to serve as market benchmarks and investment vehicles. These indices can provide relevant performance measurement tools, allowing investors to understand the performance of their investments better and make more informed decisions. Furthermore, using NLP-based indicators to design crypto baskets and indices can also help generate alpha compared to a single basket of tokens. By tracking sentiment and emerging trends over time, investment professionals can gain valuable insights into which cryptocurrencies will likely perform well in the future and which may be less favorable.
Overall, using NLP in the design of crypto baskets and indices has significant potential to improve the accuracy and reliability of these investment products. By leveraging the power of NLP to analyze large volumes of text data, investment professionals can gain valuable insights into market sentiment and emerging trends, allowing them to make more informed investment decisions and potentially generate alpha. This is why we have entered a collaboration with Compass FT to design the first AI & NLP crypto sentiment index.
Index objective
The Compass SESAMm Crypto Sentiment Index aims to give investors exposure to the crypto market with a sentiment tilt to determine the selection and weights of underlying tokens. The index selects tokens based on financial filters such as average trading volume and market capitalization. Using NLP-based sentiment scores in the weighting mechanism allows the index to rebalance towards the coins with the best sentiment scores efficiently and, therefore, those with the highest expected relative returns.
Key features
Provides smart and dynamic exposure to the cryptocurrency market
Monthly review to adapt to the fast-moving crypto ecosystem and capture up-to-date/representative sentiment for each coin
Unique quantitative weightings mechanism based on liquidity filters and sentiment scores
Invests in a basket composed of the 20 main crypto coins
Constituents are selected based on rigorous criteria considering liquidity, tokenomics, sentiment, custody, and security
Methodology and governance in line with the most constraining financial indices regulation, the European Benchmark Regulation (EU BMR)
Index mechanisms
The Compass SESAMm Crypto-Sentiment Index is a diversified digital asset index designed to offer broad exposure to the market’s top crypto assets (all sectors included) while capping each component exposure at 30%. Weightings are based on sentiment scores, liquidity, and market capitalization constraints.
SESAMm’s NLP technology carries out a granular and transparent analysis of publicly available articles. More than 20 billion articles from over 4 million international and local sources are analyzed to identify each coin’s associated mentions. For each source, indicators of sentiment and volume of mentions are determined. These indicators are then aggregated daily to create a historical time series per cryptocurrency, which acts as the basis for the overall score used by Compass Financial Technologies. For each day and each coin, SESAMm calculates crypto sentiment scores based on several indicators, such as polarity, volume, and memory functions, to provide up-to-date and representative scores. SESAMm’s Crypto sentiment scores are based on the sentiment scores (negative, positive, and neutral) computed on articles related to the 50 digital assets universe.
Analytics
Figure 1: Performance and key indicators
Reach out to SESAMm
TextReveal's web data analysis of over five million public and private companies is essential for keeping tabs on ESG investment risks. To learn more about how you can analyze web data or request a demo, contact one of our representatives.
Stay ahead with the latest in ESG and AI intelligence
Join our mailing list to receive new reports, event invites, and updates from SESAMm directly to your inbox.